

UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON D.C.
20549
FORM
10-K
(MARK
ONE)
[ X ] ANNUAL REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2008
OR
[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM
TO
.
COMMISSION
FILE NUMBER 1-13455
TETRA
Technologies, Inc.
(EXACT
NAME OF THE REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
|
DELAWARE
|
74-2148293
|
|
(STATE OR
OTHER JURISDICTION OF
|
(I.R.S.
EMPLOYER
|
|
INCORPORATION
OR ORGANIZATION)
|
IDENTIFICATION
NO.)
|
|
|
|
|
24955
INTERSTATE 45 NORTH
|
|
|
THE
WOODLANDS, TEXAS
|
77380
|
|
(ADDRESS OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)
|
(ZIP
CODE)
|
|
|
|
|
REGISTRANT’S
TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (281)
367-1983
|
|
SECURITIES
REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
|
|
|
|
|
COMMON STOCK,
PAR VALUE $.01 PER SHARE
|
NEW YORK
STOCK EXCHANGE
|
|
(TITLE OF
CLASS)
|
(NAME OF
EXCHANGE ON WHICH REGISTERED)
|
|
|
|
|
RIGHTS TO
PURCHASE SERIES ONE
|
|
|
JUNIOR
PARTICIPATING PREFERRED STOCK
|
NEW YORK
STOCK EXCHANGE
|
|
(TITLE OF
CLASS)
|
(NAME OF
EXCHANGE ON WHICH REGISTERED)
|
|
|
|
|
SECURITIES REGISTERED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
NONE
|
INDICATE BY CHECK
MARK IF THE REGISTRANT IS A WELL-KNOWN SEASONED ISSUER (AS DEFINED IN RULE 405
OF THE SECURITIES ACT). YES [ ] NO [ X
]
INDICATE BY CHECK
MARK IF THE REGISTRANT IS NOT REQUIRED TO FILE REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
SECTION 15(d) OF THE ACT. YES [ ] NO [ X
]
INDICATE BY CHECK
MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 DURING THE PRECEDING
12 MONTHS (OR FOR SUCH SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO FILE
SUCH REPORTS) AND (2) HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST
90 DAYS. YES [ X ] NO [ ]
INDICATE BY CHECK
MARK IF DISCLOSURE OF DELINQUENT FILERS PURSUANT TO ITEM 405 OF REGULATION S-K
IS NOT CONTAINED HEREIN, AND WILL NOT BE CONTAINED, TO THE BEST OF REGISTRANT’S
KNOWLEDGE, IN DEFINITIVE PROXY OR INFORMATION STATEMENTS INCORPORATED BY
REFERENCE IN PART III OF THIS FORM 10-K OR ANY AMENDMENT TO THIS FORM 10-K.
[ ]
INDICATE BY CHECK
MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT IS A LARGE ACCELERATED FILER, AN ACCELERATED FILER,
A NON-ACCELERATED FILER, OR A SMALLER REPORTING COMPANY. SEE THE DEFINITIONS OF
“LARGE ACCELERATED FILER,” “ACCELERATED FILER,” AND “SMALLER REPORTING
COMPANY” IN RULE 12b-2 OF THE EXCHANGE ACT. (CHECK
ONE):
|
LARGE
ACCELERATED FILER [ X ]
|
ACCELERATED
FILER [ ]
|
NON-ACCELERATED
FILER [ ]
|
SMALLER
REPORTING COMPANY
[ ]
|
INDICATE BY CHECK
MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT IS A SHELL COMPANY (AS DEFINED IN RULE 12b-2 OF THE
EXCHANGE ACT).
YES
[ ] NO [ X ]
THE AGGREGATE
MARKET VALUE OF COMMON STOCK HELD BY NON-AFFILIATES OF THE REGISTRANT WAS
$1,747,453,200 AS OF JUNE 30, 2008, THE LAST BUSINESS DAY OF THE REGISTRANT’S
MOST RECENTLY COMPLETED SECOND FISCAL QUARTER.
NUMBER OF
SHARES OUTSTANDING OF THE ISSUER’S COMMON STOCK AS OF FEBRUARY 27, 2009 WAS
75,260,086 SHARES.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
PART III INFORMATION IS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE TO THE REGISTRANT’S PROXY STATEMENT FOR ITS ANNUAL
MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD MAY 5, 2009 TO BE FILED WITH THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WITHIN 120 DAYS OF THE END OF THE REGISTRANT’S FISCAL
YEAR.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
Part
I
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
Business
|
1
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
11
|
|
Item
1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
22
|
|
Item
2.
|
Properties
|
22
|
|
Item
3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
26
|
|
Item
4.
|
Submission of
Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part
II
|
|
|
Item
5.
|
Market for
Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and
|
|
|
|
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
27
|
|
Item
6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
28
|
|
Item
7.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
|
|
|
|
and
Results of Operation
|
30
|
|
Item
7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
54
|
|
Item
8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
57
|
|
Item
9.
|
Changes in
and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
|
|
|
|
and
Financial Disclosure
|
57
|
|
Item
9A.
|
Controls and
Procedures
|
57
|
|
Item
9B.
|
Other
Information
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part
III
|
|
|
Item
10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
58
|
|
Item
11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
58
|
|
Item
12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
|
|
|
|
Related
Stockholder Matters
|
58
|
|
Item
13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
58
|
|
Item
14.
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part
IV
|
|
|
Item
15.
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules
|
59
|
This
Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without
limitation, statements concerning future sales, earnings, costs, expenses,
acquisitions or corporate combinations, asset recoveries, working capital, capital expenditures, financial condition, and other
results of operations. Such statements reflect our current views with respect to
future events and financial performance and are subject to certain risks,
uncertainties and assumptions, including those discussed in “Item 1A. Risk
Factors.” Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties
materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results
may vary materially from those anticipated, believed, estimated, or projected.
Unless the context requires otherwise, when we refer to “we,” “us,” and “our,”
we are describing TETRA Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis.
PART
I
Item
1. Business.
General
We
are an oil and gas services and production company with an integrated calcium
chloride and brominated products manufacturing operation that supplies
feedstocks to energy markets, as well as to other markets. We are composed of
three divisions – Fluids, Offshore, and Production Enhancement.
Our Fluids Division
manufactures and markets clear brine fluids, additives, and other associated
products and services to the oil and gas industry for use in well drilling,
completion, and workover operations both domestically and in certain regions of
Latin America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. The Division also markets certain
fluids and dry calcium chloride manufactured at its production facilities to a
variety of markets outside the energy industry.
Our Offshore
Division, which was previously known as our Well Abandonment &
Decommissioning (WA&D) Division, consists of two operating segments:
Offshore Services (previously known as WA&D Services) and Maritech, an oil
and gas exploration, exploitation, and production segment. The Offshore Services
segment provides (1) downhole and sub-sea services such as plugging and
abandonment, workover, inland water drilling, and wireline services, (2)
construction and decommissioning services, including hurricane damage
remediation, utilizing our heavy-lift barges and cutting technology in the
construction or decommissioning of offshore oil and gas production platforms and
pipelines, and (3) diving services involving conventional and saturated air
diving and the operation of several dive support vessels.
The Maritech
segment consists of our Maritech Resources, Inc. (Maritech) subsidiary, which,
with its subsidiaries, is an oil and gas exploration, exploitation, and
production company focused in the offshore, inland waters and onshore regions of
the Gulf of Mexico. Maritech acquires oil and gas properties in order to grow
its production operations and to provide additional development and exploitation
opportunities, as well as to provide a baseload of business for the Division’s
Offshore Services segment.
Our Production
Enhancement Division consists of two operating segments; Production Testing and
Compressco. The Production Testing segment provides production testing services
to markets in Texas, New Mexico, Colorado, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana,
Pennsylvania, offshore Gulf of Mexico, Mexico, Brazil, Northern Africa, and the
Middle East.
The Compressco
segment provides wellhead compression-based production enhancement services to a
broad base of customers throughout 14 states that encompass most of the onshore
producing regions of the United States, as well as in Canada, Mexico, and other
international locations. These production enhancement services can improve the
value of natural gas and oil wells by increasing daily production and total
recoverable reserves.
We continue to pursue a growth strategy that
includes expanding our existing businesses – both through internal growth and
through the pursuit of suitable acquisitions – and by identifying opportunities
to establish operations in additional domestic and international niche oil
service markets. For financial information for each of our segments, including
information regarding revenues and total assets, see “Note Q – Industry Segments
and Geographic Information” contained in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
We
were incorporated in Delaware in 1981. Our corporate headquarters are located at
24955 Interstate 45 North in The Woodlands, Texas. Our phone number is
281-367-1983 and our website is accessed at www.tetratec.com. We make available,
free of charge, on our website, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics, Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, Audit
Committee Charter, Management and Compensation Committee Charter, and Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee Charter as well as our annual report on Form
10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all
amendments to those reports as soon as is reasonably practicable after such
materials are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). The information on our website is not, and shall not
be deemed to be, a part of this annual report on Form 10-K or incorporated into
any other filings with the SEC. Information filed with the SEC may be read or
copied at SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C.
20549. Information on operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by
calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an internet website
(http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy, and information statements,
and other information regarding issuers that file electronically. We will also
make these available in print, free of charge, to any stockholder who requests
such information from the Corporate Secretary.
Products and
Services
Fluids Division
Liquid calcium
chloride, sodium bromide, calcium bromide, zinc bromide, and similar products
produced by our Fluids Division are referred to as clear brine fluids (CBFs) in
the oil and gas industry. CBFs are solids-free, clear salt solutions that, like
conventional drilling “muds,” have high specific gravities and are used as
weighting fluids to control bottomhole pressures during oil and gas completion
and workover activities. The use of CBFs increases production by reducing the
likelihood of damage to the wellbore and productive pay zone. CBFs are
particularly important in offshore completion and workover operations due to the
greater formation sensitivity, the significantly greater investment necessary to
drill offshore, and the consequent higher cost of error. CBFs are manufactured
and distributed by our Fluids Division and are also sold to other companies that
service customers in the oil and gas industry.
Our Fluids Division
provides basic and custom blended CBFs to domestic and international oil and gas
well operators, based on the specific need of the customer and the proposed
application of the product. We also provide these customers with a broad range
of associated services, including onsite fluid filtration, handling, and
recycling; wellbore cleanup; fluid engineering consultation; and fluid
management, including high volume water transfer services in support of high
pressure fracturing processes. We also offer to repurchase (buyback) used CBFs
from customers, which we then recondition and recycle. The utilization of
reconditioned CBFs reduces the net cost of the CBFs to our customers and
minimizes the need to dispose of used fluids. We recondition the CBFs through
filtration, blending, and the use of proprietary chemical processes, and then
market the reconditioned CBFs.
The Division’s
fluid engineering and management personnel use proprietary technology to
determine the optimal CBF blend for a customer’s particular application to
maximize the effectiveness and lifespan of the CBFs. We modify the specific
volume, density, crystallization temperature, and chemical composition of the
CBFs to satisfy a customer’s specific requirements. Our filtration services use
a variety of techniques and equipment for the onsite removal of particulates
from CBFs, so that those CBFs can be recirculated back into the well. Filtration
also enables recovery of a greater percentage of used CBFs for
recycling.
The chemicals
manufacturing group of the Fluids Division obtains product from numerous
production facilities that manufacture liquid and/or dry calcium chloride,
sodium bromide, calcium bromide, zinc bromide and/or zinc calcium bromide for
distribution into energy markets. Liquid and dry calcium chloride are also sold
into the water treatment, industrial, cement, food processing, dust control, ice
melt, agricultural, and consumer products markets. Liquid sodium bromide is also
sold into the industrial water treatment markets, where it is used as a biocide
in recirculated cooling tower waters.
We
obtain liquid and dry calcium chloride from production facilities located in the
United States, Canada, China, and Europe. We own some of these plants, and we
obtain production from the non-owned plants under agreements with the owners.
Dry calcium chloride is produced at our Kokkola, Finland plant, which has a
production capacity of 165,000 tons per year. We operate our European calcium
chloride manufacturing operations under the name TCE. We also own a calcium
chloride plant in Lake Charles, Louisiana, with a production capacity of 100,000
tons of dry product per year. In addition, we are constructing a new calcium
chloride plant near El Dorado, Arkansas, to produce liquid and dry (flake)
calcium chloride with production scheduled to begin in late 2009. We also
manufacture liquid calcium chloride from our facility in Parkersburg, West
Virginia. We also have two solar evaporation plants located in San Bernardino
County, California, which produce liquid calcium chloride from underground brine
reserves.
We
manufacture and distribute sodium bromide, calcium bromide and zinc bromide from
our West Memphis, Arkansas facility. A patented and proprietary production
process utilized at this facility uses bromine or hydrobromic acid, along with
various zinc sources, to manufacture its products. The group purchases raw
material bromine pursuant to a long-term supply agreement. This facility also
uses patented and proprietary technologies to recondition and upgrade used CBFs
repurchased from our customers.
We
also have approximately 33,000 gross acres of bromine-containing brine reserves
in Magnolia, Arkansas that are under lease. We hold these assets for possible
future development.
See “Note Q – Industry Segments and Geographic
Information” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for financial
information about this Division.
Offshore
Division
Our Offshore
Division consists of two separate operating segments: the Offshore Services and
Maritech segments. The Offshore Services segment provides (1) downhole and
sub-sea services such as plugging and abandonment, workover, inland water
drilling, and wireline services, (2) construction and decommissioning services,
including hurricane remediation, utilizing our heavy-lift barges and cutting
technology in the construction or decommissioning of offshore oil and gas
production platforms and pipelines, and (3) diving services involving
conventional and saturated air diving and the operation of several dive support
vessels. While we are a leading provider of these services to the offshore Gulf
of Mexico well abandonment and decommissioning markets, we provide these
services to other oilfield markets as well, including the inland water and
onshore markets in the Gulf of Mexico region. We offer comprehensive, integrated
solutions to our customers including engineering consultation and project
management services. We provide individualized services to meet our customers’
specific requirements. The Maritech segment is an oil and gas exploration,
exploitation, and production company focused in the offshore and inland waters
of the Gulf of Mexico. Maritech acquires oil and gas properties on which it
conducts exploitation operations that are intended to increase the cash flows on
such properties prior to their ultimate abandonment. In addition, oil and gas
properties acquired by Maritech provide a baseload of business for the Offshore
Services segment.
In providing its array of services, our
Offshore Services segment utilizes barge-mounted rigs, a platform rig, offshore
rigless packages, two heavy lift vessels, several dive support vessels and other
dive support assets and onshore rigs which we own and operate. In addition, we
rent certain equipment from third party contractors whenever necessary. The
Division provides a wide variety of contract diving services to its customers
through our subsidiary, Epic Diving & Marine Services (Epic). Construction,
well abandonment, and decommissioning services are performed primarily offshore
in the Gulf of Mexico, although the Division also provides well abandonment
services to customers in the inland waters and
onshore in Texas
and Louisiana. The Division also provides onshore and offshore cutting services
and tool rentals through its E.O.T. Rentals (EOT) operations. The Division’s
electric wireline operations provide pressure transient testing, reservoir
evaluation, well performance evaluation, cased hole and memory production
logging, perforating, bridge plug and packer services, and pipe recovery
services. The Offshore Services segment has been successful in marketing its
experience utilizing the specialized equipment and engineering expertise
necessary to address a variety of specific construction and platform
decommissioning issues, including project management and the issues associated
with platforms toppled or severely damaged by hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico.
The Division provides services to major oil and gas companies and independent
operators, including Maritech, through its facilities located in Belle Chasse,
Broussard, Harvey, and Houma, Louisiana and in Bryan and Victoria,
Texas.
The size of our
Offshore Division’s fleet of service vessels has been adjusted in recent years
to serve the changing demand for well abandonment, construction, platform
decommissioning, diving, and other offshore services. We currently have two
vessels with the capacity to perform heavy lift projects and integrated
operations on oil and gas production platforms. Subsequent to our acquisition of
Epic in March 2006, we purchased a dynamically positioned dive support vessel,
which we renamed the Epic Diver, and refurbished two of Epic’s existing dive
support vessels, the Epic Explorer and the Epic Seahorse. Both the Epic Diver
and the Epic Explorer offer saturation diving systems that are rated for up to
1,000 foot dive depths.
Maritech acquires,
manages, and exploits oil and gas properties in the offshore, inland water and
onshore region of the Gulf of Mexico. Maritech acquires properties for their
potential for additional exploitation, although many of Maritech’s producing
properties were also purchased to support the Division’s Offshore Services
businesses. Federal regulations generally require lessees to plug and abandon
wells and decommission the associated platforms, pipelines, and other equipment
within one year after the lease terminates.
Maritech’s
operations grew substantially during the past several years due to the
acquisition of offshore Gulf of Mexico producing properties and subsequent
development activities on these properties. The most recent acquisitions of oil
and gas properties were in December 2007 and January 2008, when Maritech
purchased oil and gas producing properties in three separate transactions for an
aggregate of $75.1 million of cash and the assumption of associated
decommissioning liabilities having an undiscounted value of approximately $51.5
million. In December 2007, we acquired interests in certain offshore properties
located primarily in the Main Pass area of the Gulf of Mexico from a subsidiary
of Cimarex Energy. We refer to these properties as the Cimarex Properties. An
additional interest in one of the Cimarex Properties was also acquired in a
separate transaction from an unrelated third party. Maritech completed a new
condensate pipeline in April 2008, which eliminated the barging of produced
condensate from the Cimarex Properties, resulting in significantly increased
production in an area which had previously been restricted. This connecting
pipeline also serves other producing properties operated by third parties. In
July 2008, Maritech further developed the Cimarex Properties by completing the
hookup of three new sub-sea wells, specifically on Main Pass blocks 185, 187,
and 200, and these wells are currently capable of producing approximately 17
MMcf/day and 119 barrels/day, net to Maritech’s interest. Maritech began
production from four additional subsea wells in the Main Pass area during
February 2009, at rates of approximately 11 MMcf/day and 175 barrels/day, net to
Maritech’s interest. In addition, the acquired Cimarex Properties, through their
accompanying leasehold ownership, provide us with additional development
prospects which we intend to exploit over the next several years utilizing 100
blocks of purchased and reprocessed 3D seismic data. In January 2008, we
acquired certain offshore oil and gas producing properties from Stone Energy
Corporation. During the three year period ended December 31, 2008, Maritech
significantly increased its acquisition, and exploitation activities, spending
approximately $324.0 million on such projects. As a result of this acquisition
and exploitation activity, at December 31, 2008, Maritech had proved reserves of
approximately 5.9 million barrels of oil and 42.0 billion cubic feet of natural
gas, with undiscounted future net pretax cash flow of approximately $50.9
million.
See “Note Q –
Industry Segments and Geographic Information” in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for financial information about this
Division.
Production
Enhancement Division
The Production
Testing segment of the Production Enhancement Division provides flowback
pressure and volume testing of oil and gas wells, providing reservoir data
necessary to enable operators to optimize production and minimize oil and gas
reservoir damage. In addition, the Production Testing segment provides services
for coiled tubing, pipeline cleanout, blowout prevention, and laboratory
analysis. Many of these services involve sophisticated evaluation techniques
needed for reservoir management and optimization of well workover
programs.
The Production
Testing segment maintains one of the largest fleets of high pressure production
testing equipment in the United States. This includes equipment specifically
designed to work in environments in which high levels of hydrogen sulfide gas
are present. The Production Testing segment has operating locations in Alice,
Benbrook, Corpus Christi, Edinburg, Laredo, Midland, Palestine, and Victoria,
Texas. The Division also has operating locations in Parachute, Colorado; New
Iberia and Bossier City, Louisiana; Rochester, Pennsylvania; Reynosa,
Villahermosa, Poza Rica, and Veracruz, Mexico; Macae, Brazil; Tripoli, Libya;
Manama, Bahrain; and Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
The Division’s
Compressco segment is a leading provider of wellhead compression-based
production enhancement services to a broad base of natural gas and oil
exploration and production companies. These production enhancement services
include compression, liquids separation, gas metering services, and ongoing well
evaluations. Although Compressco’s services are applied primarily to mature
wells with low formation pressures, the services are also employed on newer
wells that have experienced significant production declines or are characterized
by lower formation pressures. Compressco designs and manufactures the compressor
equipment (the GasJackTM units)
it uses to provide production enhancement services. Compressco’s fleet of
GasJackTM units
totaled 3,605 as of December 31, 2008, of which 3,064 units were in service,
representing an increase in the number of units in service of approximately 11%
from the prior year.
Compressco’s
GasJackTM unit
increases gas production by reducing surface pressure to allow wellbore liquids
that would normally block gas flow to produce up the well. The fluids are
separated from the gas and liquid-free gas flows into the GasJackTM unit,
where the gas is compressed. The GasJackTM unit is
an integrated power/compressor unit equipped with an industrial 460-cubic inch,
V-8 engine that uses natural gas from the well to power one bank of cylinders,
while the other cylinders provide compression. This configuration is capable of
creating suction conditions that range from 12 in/hg (inches of mercury) of
negative pressure to 60 PSIG (Pounds per Square Inch Gauge) of positive
pressure and discharge pressures of up to 450 PSIG. Compressco utilizes its
GasJackTM units
in conjunction with its personnel to provide compression services to its
customers, primarily on a month to month basis. Compressco services its
compressors and provides maintenance service on sold units, through a staff of
mobile field technicians who are based throughout Compressco’s market areas. To
a lesser extent, Compressco also sells GasJackTM units
to customers.
See “Note Q – Industry Segments and Geographic
Information” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for financial
information about this Division.
Sources
of Raw Materials
Our Fluids Division
manufactures calcium chloride, sodium bromide, calcium bromide, zinc bromide,
and zinc calcium bromide for distribution to its customers. The Division also
recycles calcium and zinc bromide CBFs repurchased from its oil and gas
customers.
The Division
manufactures liquid calcium chloride from a reaction of hydrochloric acid and
limestone and from natural underground brine reserves. The Division also
purchases liquid and dry calcium chloride from a number of domestic and
international chemical manufacturers. Some of the Division’s primary sources of
hydrochloric acid are chemical co-product streams obtained from chemical
manufacturers. We have written agreements with certain of those chemical
companies regarding the supply of hydrochloric acid or calcium chloride. We
purchase raw materials utilized by our Lake Charles facility from a variety of
sources, although supply constraints have resulted in this facility operating at
less than full capacity. When supply of liquid calcium chloride is available,
the Lake Charles plant also produces solid (pellet) calcium chloride. The Lake
Charles pellet plant operated for four months during
2008. The raw
material supply for our Lake Charles facility is expected to be enhanced with
liquid calcium chloride to be provided by our new El Dorado, Arkansas plant. We
also produce calcium chloride at our two plants in San Bernardino County,
California through evaporation of naturally occurring underground brine
reserves. These brines are deemed adequate to supply our foreseeable need for
calcium chloride in that market area. Substantial quantities of limestone are
also consumed when converting hydrochloric acid into calcium chloride. We use a
proprietary process that permits the use of less expensive limestone, while
maintaining end-use product quality. We purchase limestone from several
different sources. Currently, hydrochloric acid and limestone are generally
available from multiple sources. In addition, we purchase liquid calcium
chloride from a Delfzijl, Netherlands plant owned by a joint venture in which we
have a 50% ownership interest.
To
significantly increase our existing production capacity, we are constructing a
new calcium chloride manufacturing plant located on land purchased from Chemtura
Corporation (Chemtura) and adjacent to Chemtura’s central bromine plant, located
near El Dorado, Arkansas. This new plant, which is designed to produce liquid
and flake calcium chloride, along with other co-products such as magnesium
hydroxide and sodium chloride, is expected to allow the Division to reduce its
dependence on third party suppliers. The plant is designed to utilize calcium
chloride containing brines obtained from Chemtura’s operations. Construction of
the new El Dorado calcium chloride plant is expected to be completed in late
2009.
To
produce calcium bromide, zinc bromide, and zinc calcium bromide at our West
Memphis, Arkansas facility, we use primarily bromine and various sources of zinc
raw materials and lime. We use proprietary and patented processes that permit
the use of cost-advantaged raw materials, while maintaining high product
quality. There are multiple sources of zinc that we can use in the production of
zinc bromide. In December 2006, we entered into a long-term supply agreement
with Chemtura, whereby the Division will purchase its requirements of raw
material bromine from Chemtura’s Arkansas bromine facilities. In addition,
Chemtura will supply the Division’s new El Dorado calcium chloride plant with
tail brine from its Arkansas facilities following bromine extraction. Upon
entering the long-term Chemtura supply agreement, we amended our previous less
favorable long-term supply agreement for calcium bromide. As part of this
amendment, we agreed to meet certain purchase requirements through 2008. In
December 2007, we entered into an agreement with our previous supplier whereby
we were released from our remaining purchase requirements and the supply
agreement was terminated in exchange for future payments totaling approximately
$9.3 million to be made in 2008 and early 2009.
We
also own a calcium bromide manufacturing plant near Magnolia, Arkansas that was
constructed in 1985. This plant was acquired in 1988 and is not operable. We
currently have approximately 33,000 gross acres of bromine-containing brine
reserves under lease in the vicinity of this plant. While this plant is designed
to produce calcium bromide, it could be modified to produce elemental bromine or
select bromine compounds. We believe we have sufficient brine reserves under
lease to operate a world-scale bromine facility for 25 to 30 years. Development
of the brine field, construction of necessary pipelines and reconfiguration of
the plant would require a substantial capital investment. The execution of the
Chemtura bromine supply agreement discussed above provides us with an immediate
supply of bromine to support the Division’s current operations. We do, however,
continue to evaluate our strategy related to the Magnolia, Arkansas assets and
their future development. Chemtura holds certain rights to participate in the
development of the Magnolia, Arkansas assets.
Our Production
Enhancement Division, through its Compressco segment, designs and manufactures
its compressor equipment (the GasJackTM units)
which it uses to provide wellhead compression-based production enhancement
services. Some of the components used in the GasJackTM units
are obtained from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. Compressco
does not have long-term contracts with these suppliers. While a partial or
complete loss of certain of these suppliers could have a negative impact on
Compressco’s business, Compressco believes there are adequate, alternative
suppliers of these components and that this impact would not be
severe.
Market
Overview and Competition
Fluids
Division
Our Fluids Division
sells CBFs, drilling and completion fluid systems, additives, and related
products and services to oil and gas exploration and production companies,
onshore and offshore, in the United States and worldwide. Current areas of
market presence include the U.S. onshore Gulf Coast, the U.S. Gulf of Mexico,
the North Sea, Mexico, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. The Division is
also capitalizing on the current trend toward deepwater operations which utilize
a larger volume of CBFs and are subject to harsh downhole conditions such as
high pressure and high temperatures. In June 2008, we announced that we had
signed a contract with Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras), the national oil
company of Brazil, to provide completion fluids and associated services on
deepwater wells offshore Brazil.
The Division’s
principal competitors in the sale of CBFs to the oil and gas industry are Baroid
Corporation, a subsidiary of Halliburton Company; M-I L.L.C., a joint venture
between Smith International, Inc. and Schlumberger Limited; and BJ Services
Company. This market is highly competitive and competition is based primarily on
service, availability, and price. Although all competitors provide fluid
handling, filtration, and recycling services, we believe that our historical
focus on providing these and other value-added services to our customers has
enabled us to compete successfully. Besides Petrobras, major customers of the
Fluids Division also include Anadarko, Chevron, Devon, Dominion Resources, EOG
Resources, Halliburton Company, LLOG Exploration, Newfield Exploration Company,
Nippon Oil Exploration, and Shell Oil. The Division also sells its products
through various distributors worldwide.
Our liquid and dry
calcium chloride products have a wide range of uses outside the energy industry.
The non-energy market segments to which our products are marketed include
agricultural, industrial, governmental, mining, janitorial, construction,
pharmaceutical, and food processing. These products promote snow and ice melt,
dust control, cement curing, food processing, dehumidification, and road
stabilization and are also used as a source of calcium nutrients to improve
agricultural yields. We also sell sodium bromide into the industrial water
treatment markets as a biocide under the BioRid® trade
name. Most of these markets are highly competitive. The Division’s European
calcium chloride manufacturing operations based in Kokkola, Finland permit us to
market our calcium chloride products to certain European markets. Our major
competitors in the calcium chloride market include Dow Chemical Company and
Industrial del Alkali in North America, and Brunner Mond, Solvay, and NedMag in
Europe.
Offshore
Division
Our Offshore
Division consists of our Offshore Services and Maritech segments. The Division’s
Offshore Services operations provide downhole and sub-sea services such as well
abandonment, contract diving, construction, cutting, and decommissioning
services offshore, primarily in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. In addition, the
Division also provides well abandonment, workover, drilling, and wireline
services in the onshore and inland water areas of the U.S. Gulf Coast regions of
Texas and Louisiana. Long-term demand for the Offshore Division’s offshore well
abandonment and decommissioning services is predominately driven by the maturity
and decline of producing fields in the Gulf of Mexico, aging offshore platform
infrastructure, damage from storms, and government regulations. Demand for the
Offshore Division’s construction, drilling, and other services is driven by the
general level of activity of its customers, which are also affected by oil and
natural gas prices and the general economic condition of the industry. In the
market areas in which we currently operate, regulations generally require wells
to be plugged, offshore platforms decommissioned, pipelines abandoned, and the
well site cleared within twelve months after an oil or gas lease expires. The
maturity and production decline of Gulf of Mexico oil and gas fields has, over
time, caused an increase in the number of wells to be plugged and abandoned and
platforms and pipelines to be decommissioned. Current and projected demand for
offshore abandonment and decommissioning services increased substantially as a
result of 2005 and 2008 hurricane activity in the Gulf of Mexico, which
destroyed or caused significant damage to a large number of offshore platforms
and associated wells. The Division has developed specialized equipment and
engineering expertise to provide such services to customers whose offshore wells
and production platforms were toppled, destroyed, or heavily damaged by such
storms. The threat of future storm activity, combined with increases in related
property damage insurance costs, has also accelerated the
abandonment and
decommissioning plans of many offshore operators. Offshore activities in the
Gulf of Mexico have historically been highly seasonal, with the majority
occurring during the months of April through October when weather conditions are
most favorable. Critical factors required to participate in the current market
include, among other factors: having an adequate fleet of the proper equipment
to meet current market demand and conditions; having qualified, experienced
personnel; having technical expertise to address varying downhole, surface, and
sub-sea conditions, particularly those related to damaged wells and platforms;
having the financial strength to ensure all abandonment and decommissioning
obligations are satisfied; and having a comprehensive safety and environmental
program. We believe our integrated service package and vessel fleet satisfy
these market requirements, allowing us to successfully compete.
The Division
markets its services primarily to major oil and gas companies and independent
operators. Major customers include Apache, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil,
Forest Oil, Mariner Energy, Newfield Exploration, Pioneer, Shell Oil, Stone
Energy, and W&T Offshore. These services are performed primarily offshore in
the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, and in the Gulf Coast inland waters and onshore in
Texas and Louisiana. Our principal competitors in the offshore and inland water
markets are Global Industries, Ltd., Offshore Specialties, Inc., Helix Energy
Solutions, Cal Dive
International, Inc., and Superior Energy Services, Inc. This market is highly
competitive and competition is based primarily on service, equipment
availability, safety record, and price. Our ability to successfully bid our
services can fluctuate from year to year, depending on market
conditions.
The Division’s
Maritech operation competes with a wide number of independent Gulf of Mexico
operators for the acquisition and leasing of oil and gas properties. Maritech
typically acquires oil and gas properties from major oil and gas companies as
well as from independent operators. Our ability to acquire producing oil and gas
properties under acceptable terms is dependent on numerous factors, including
oil and natural gas commodity prices, the availability of suitable properties
for acquisition, the age and condition of offshore production platforms, and the
level of competition from other operators pursuing such properties. Maritech
sells its oil and gas production to a variety of purchasers; however, for the
year ended December 31, 2008, Maritech had one customer, Shell Trading (US)
Company, that accounted for 13.5% of our consolidated revenues. We did not have
any other individual customer account for more than 10% of our consolidated
revenues. We believe that Maritech’s access to its affiliated Offshore Services
segment allows it to better assess and evaluate the abandonment and
decommissioning obligations associated with acquired properties. This access
gives Maritech an advantage over many other operators with which it competes for
property acquisitions.
Production
Enhancement Division
The Production
Enhancement Division, through its Production Testing and Compressco segments,
provides production testing and wellhead compression based services and products
to its customers. The Production Testing segment provides services primarily to
the natural gas segment of the oil and gas industry. In certain gas producing
basins, water, sand, and other abrasive materials commonly accompany the initial
production of natural gas, often under high pressure and high temperature
conditions and in reservoirs containing high levels of hydrogen sulfide gas. The
Division provides the specialized equipment and qualified personnel to address
these impediments to production and to pressure test wells and wellhead
equipment. The Production Testing segment also provides a variety of reservoir
management and laboratory testing services for oil and gas producing properties,
including coiled tubing, pipeline cleanout, blowout prevention, distillation
analysis, gas composition analysis, and oilfield water analysis
services.
The production
testing market is highly competitive, and competition is based on availability
of equipment and qualified personnel, as well as price, quality of service, and
safety record. We believe our equipment and operating procedures give us a
competitive advantage in the marketplace. Competition in onshore markets is
dominated by numerous small, privately owned operators. Schlumberger Limited and
Expro International are major competitors in the U.S. offshore market and
international markets. Our customers include Chesapeake, ConocoPhillips, El Paso
Corporation, Encana Oil & Gas, Quicksilver Resources, Shell Oil, PEMEX (the
national oil company of Mexico), Petrobras (the national oil company of Brazil),
and ARAMCO (the national oil company of Saudi Arabia).
The Division’s
Compressco segment provides production enhancement services to over 400 natural
gas and oil producers throughout 14 states that encompass most of the onshore
producing regions of the United States, as well as in Canada, Mexico, and other
international locations. Most of Compressco’s services are performed in the
Ark-La-Tex Basin, San Juan Basin and Mid-Continent region of the United States.
Compressco primarily targets natural gas wells in its operating regions that
produce between 30 thousand and 300 thousand cubic feet of natural gas per day,
with less than 50 barrels of water per day. Compressco believes that the
majority of the wells it targets do not currently utilize production enhancement
services. Compressco continues to seek opportunities to further expand its
operations into other regions in the Western Hemisphere and elsewhere in the
world.
The wellhead
compression based production enhancement services business is highly
competitive, and competition primarily comes from various local and regional
companies that utilize packages consisting of a screw compressor with a separate
engine driver or a reciprocating compressor with a separate engine driver. To a
lesser extent, Compressco faces competition from large national and
multinational companies that have traditionally focused on higher-horsepower
natural gas gathering and transportation equipment and services. While many of
Compressco’s competitors attempt to compete on the basis of price, Compressco
believes that its pricing is competitive because of the significant increases in
the value of natural gas wells that result from the quality of its services, its
trained field personnel, and its GasJackTM unit
that it uses to provide the services. Compressco’s major customers include BP,
PEMEX, Devon, Chesapeake, and EXCO Resources.
Other Business
Matters
Marketing
and Distribution
The Fluids Division
markets its CBF products and services through its distribution facilities
located in the Gulf Coast region of the United States, the North Sea region of
Europe, and other selected international markets. These facilities are in close
proximity to both product supplies and customer concentrations. Since
transportation costs can represent a large percentage of the total delivered
cost of chemical products, particularly liquid chemicals, we believe that our
Fluids Division’s strategic locations give us a competitive advantage over
certain other suppliers of CBFs in the southern United States and California. In
addition, the Fluids Division supplies CBFs to selected international markets,
including Brazil, Mexico, the British and Norwegian sectors of the North Sea,
West Africa, and the Middle East.
Non-oilfield
calcium chloride products are also marketed through the Division’s sales offices
in California, Missouri, Pennsylvania, and Texas, as well as through a network
of distributors located throughout the United States and northern and central
Europe. In addition to shipping products directly from its production facilities
in the United States and Europe, the Division has distribution facilities
strategically located to provide efficient product distribution.
Backlog
The level of
backlog is not indicative of our estimated future revenues because a majority of
our products and services either are not sold under long-term contracts or do
not require long lead times to procure or deliver. Our backlog consists of
estimated future revenues associated with a portion of our well abandonment and
decommissioning business, and consists of the non-Maritech share of the well
abandonment and decommissioning work associated with the oil and gas properties
operated by Maritech. Our estimated backlog on December 31, 2008 was $137.8
million, of which approximately $42.0 million is expected to be billed during
2009. This compares to an estimated backlog of $175.5 million at December 31,
2007.
Employees
As
of December 31, 2008, we had 3,107 employees. None of our U.S. employees are
presently covered by a collective bargaining agreement, other than the employees
of our Lake Charles, Louisiana calcium chloride production facility, who are
represented by the United Steelworkers Union. Our international employees are
generally members of the various labor unions and associations common to the
countries in which we operate. We believe that our
relations with our employees are good.
Patents,
Proprietary Technology, and Trademarks
As
of December 31, 2008, we owned or licensed twenty-four issued U.S. patents and
had nine patent applications pending in the United States. Internationally, we
had fourteen issued foreign patents and thirty-seven foreign patent applications
pending. The foreign patents and patent applications are primarily foreign
counterparts to U.S. patents or patent applications. The issued patents expire
at various times through 2026. We have elected to maintain certain other
internally developed technologies, know-how, and inventions as trade secrets.
While we believe that the protection of our patents and trade secrets is
important to our competitive positions in our businesses, we do not believe any
one patent or trade secret is essential to our success.
It
is our practice to enter into confidentiality agreements with key employees,
consultants, and third parties to whom we disclose our confidential and
proprietary information. There can be no assurance, however, that these measures
will prevent the unauthorized disclosure or use of our trade secrets and
expertise or that others may not independently develop similar trade secrets or
expertise. Our management believes, however, that it would require a substantial
period of time and substantial resources to independently develop similar
know-how or technology. As a policy, we use all possible legal means to protect
our patents, trade secrets, and other proprietary information.
We
sell various products and services under a variety of trademarks and service
marks, some of which are registered in the United States or certain foreign
countries.
Health,
Safety, and Environmental Affairs Regulations
We
are subject to various federal, state, local, and international laws and
regulations relating to occupational health and safety and the environment,
including regulations and permitting for air emissions, wastewater and
stormwater discharges, the disposal of certain hazardous and nonhazardous
wastes, and wetlands preservation. Failure to comply with these occupational
health, safety, and environmental laws and regulations or associated permits may
result in the assessment of fines and penalties and the imposition of
investigatory and remedial obligations.
With respect to our
domestic operations, various environmental protection laws and regulations have
been enacted and amended in the United States during the past three decades in
response to public concerns pertaining to the environment. Our U.S. operations
and its customers are subject to these various evolving environmental laws and
corresponding regulations. In the United States, these laws and regulations are
enforced by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; the Minerals Management
Service of the U.S. Department of the Interior (MMS); the U.S. Coast Guard; and
various other federal, state, and local environmental authorities. Similar laws
and regulations, designed to protect the health and safety of our employees and
visitors to our facilities, are enforced by the U.S. Occupational Safety and
Health Administration and other state and local agencies and authorities. We
must comply with the requirements of environmental laws and regulations
applicable to our operations, including the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
of 1972; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA); the Clean
Air Act of 1977; the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA); the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
of 1986 (SARA); the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act of 1947
(FIFRA); the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act of 1975; and the Pollution
Prevention Act of 1990.
Our operations
outside the United States are subject to various international governmental
controls and restrictions pertaining to the environment, occupational health and
safety, and other regulated activities in the countries in which we operate. We
believe our operations are in substantial compliance with existing international
governmental controls and regulations and that compliance with these
international controls and regulations has not had a material adverse affect on
operations.
At
our production plants, we hold various permits regulating air emissions,
wastewater and stormwater discharges, the disposal of certain hazardous and
nonhazardous wastes, and wetlands preservation.
We
believe that our manufacturing plants and other facilities are in general
compliance with all applicable health, safety, and environmental laws and
regulations. Since our inception, we have not had a history of any significant
fines or claims in connection with environmental or health and safety matters.
However, risks of substantial costs and liabilities are inherent in certain
plant and service operations and in the development and handling of certain
products and equipment produced or used at our plants, well locations, and
worksites. Because of these risks, there can be no assurance that significant
costs and liabilities will not be incurred in the future. Changes in
environmental and health and safety regulations could subject us to more
rigorous standards. We cannot predict the extent to which our operations may be
affected by future regulatory and enforcement policies.
Item
1A. Risk Factors.
Forward
Looking Statements
Certain information
included in this report, other materials filed or to be filed with the SEC, as
well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made
or to be made by us contain or incorporate by reference certain statements
(other than statements of historical fact) that constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. When used herein, the words
“budget,” “budgeted,” “assumes,” “should,” “goal,” “anticipates,” “expects,”
“could,” “believes,” “seeks,” “plans,” “intends,” “projects” or “targets” and
similar expressions that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes are
intended to identify forward-looking statements. Where any forward-looking
statement includes a statement of the assumptions or bases underlying such
forward-looking statement, we caution that, while we believe these assumptions
or bases to be reasonable and to be made in good faith, assumed facts or bases
almost always vary from actual results, and the difference between assumed facts
or bases and actual results could be material, depending on the circumstances.
It is important to note that actual results could differ materially from those
projected by such forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the
expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable and
such forward-looking statements are based upon the best data available at the
date this report is filed with the SEC, we cannot assure you that such
expectations will prove correct. Factors that could cause our results to differ
materially from the results discussed in such forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to, the following: activity levels for oil and gas
drilling, completion, workover, production, and abandonment activities;
volatility of oil and gas prices; general economic and business conditions
including the impact the current economic uncertainty may have on us or our
customers; foreign currency risks; operating risks inherent in oil and gas
production; weather; our ability to implement our business strategy;
uncertainties about estimates of reserves; environmental risks; estimates of
hurricane repair costs; and risks related to our foreign operations. All such
forward-looking statements in this document are expressly qualified in their
entirety by the cautionary statements in this paragraph, and we undertake no
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements.
Certain
Business Risks
Although it is not
possible to identify all of the risks we encounter, we have identified the
following important risk factors which could affect our actual results and cause
actual results to differ materially from any such results that might be
projected, forecasted, or estimated by us in this report.
Market
Risks:
The demand for our products
and services is affected by the current global financial
crisis.
The demand for our
products and services are materially dependent on levels of oil and gas well
drilling, completion, workover, production, and abandonment activities, both in
the United States and internationally. Such activity levels have decreased as a
result of the recent decline in energy consumption and uncertainty of the
capital markets caused by the current global financial crisis. Decreased energy
consumption has resulted in a significant decrease in energy prices during the
last half of 2008 and continuing into 2009. This decline in energy prices has
negatively affected the operating cash flows and capital plans of many of our
customers, as well as our Maritech subsidiary, which has negatively impacted the
demand for many of our products and services.
The consequences of
a prolonged economic recession may include a further decrease in economic
activity, including oil and gas industry spending levels, for an extended period
of time. This decrease in economic activity would negatively affect both the
demand for many of our products and services as well as the prices we charge for
these products and services which would continue to affect our revenues and
future growth. Many of our customers finance their drilling and production
operations through third-party lenders. The reduced availability and increased
cost of borrowing could cause our customers to reduce their spending on drilling
programs, thereby reducing demand and potentially resulting in lower pricing for
our products and services. Continued instability in the capital markets, as a
result of recession or otherwise, also may continue to affect the cost of
capital and the ability to raise capital, both for us and our
customers.
During times when
the oil or natural gas markets weaken, many of our customers are more likely to
experience a downturn in their financial condition. Current economic conditions
may be exacerbated by insufficient financial sector liquidity leading to
additional constraints on the operating cash flows of our customers, further
limiting their activities and also potentially impacting their ability to pay us
in a timely manner, which could result in increased customer bankruptcies and
may lead to increased uncollectible receivables.
Further, an
increasing number of financial institutions and insurance companies have
reported deterioration in their financial condition. If any of our lenders,
insurers or other financial institutions are unable to fulfill their obligations
under our various credit agreements, insurance policies and other contracts, and
we are unable to find suitable replacements at a reasonable cost, our results of
operations, liquidity and cash flows could be adversely impacted.
Our oil and gas revenues and
cash flows are subject to continued price risk.
Our revenues from
oil and gas production represent approximately 20.5% of our total consolidated
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2008. Therefore, we have significant
direct market risk exposure in the pricing of our oil and gas production. Our
realized pricing is primarily driven by the prevailing worldwide price for crude
oil and spot prices in the U.S. natural gas market and the portion of our oil
and gas production that is hedged. During the first half of 2008, and prior to
the impact of our derivative hedges, crude oil and natural gas prices received
for Maritech’s production averaged $114.01 and $10.29, respectively. During
December 2008, these crude oil and natural gas prices received averaged $32.45
and $6.19, respectively. This price volatility is expected to continue.
Significant further declines in prices for oil and natural gas could have a
material affect on our results of operations and quantities of reserves
recoverable on an economic basis. Our risk management activities involve the use
of derivative financial instruments, such as swap agreements, to hedge the
impact of market price risk exposures for a portion of our oil and gas
production. This means that a portion of our production is sold at a fixed price
as a shield against price declines that could occur in the market. These hedging
activities limit our upside potential from oil and gas price increases, but also
limit our downside risk of decreasing oil and gas prices. In addition, we are
exposed to the volatility of oil and gas prices for the portion of our oil and
gas production that is not hedged.
Oil and gas prices
and, therefore, the levels of well drilling, completion, workover, and
production activities, tend to fluctuate. Worldwide military, political, and
economic events, including initiatives by the Organization of Petroleum
Exporting Countries and increasing or decreasing demand in other large world
economies, have contributed to, and are likely to continue to contribute to,
price volatility. The development of additional competing non-oil and gas energy
supplies, efforts to improve energy conservation, and improvements in the energy
efficiency of vehicles, plants, equipment, and devices may also reduce oil and
gas consumption.
The profitability of our
operations is dependent on other numerous factors beyond our
control.
Our operating
results in general, and gross profit in particular, are functions of market
conditions and the product and service mix sold in any period. Other factors,
such as heightened price competition, changes in sales and distribution
channels, availability of skilled labor and contract services, shortages in raw
materials due to untimely supplies, or inability to obtain supplies at
reasonable prices may also continue to affect the cost of sales and the
fluctuation of gross margin in future periods.
Other factors
affecting our operating activity levels include the cost of exploring for and
producing oil and gas, the discovery rate of new oil and gas reserves, and the
remaining recoverable reserves in the basins in which we operate. A large
concentration of our operating activities is located in the onshore and offshore
region of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Our revenues and profitability are
particularly dependent upon oil and gas industry activity and spending levels in
the Gulf of Mexico region. Our operations may also be affected by technological
advances, interest rates and cost of capital, tax policies, and overall
worldwide economic activity. Adverse changes in any of these other factors may
depress the levels of well drilling, completion, workover, and production
activity and result in a corresponding decline in the demand for our products
and services, thereby having a material adverse effect on our revenues and
profitability.
We encounter and expect to
continue to encounter intense competition in the sale of our products and
services.
We
compete with numerous companies in our operations. Many of our competitors have
substantially greater financial and other related resources than we have. To the
extent competitors offer comparable products or services at lower prices, or
higher quality and more cost-effective products or services, our business could
be materially and adversely affected. Certain competitors may also be better
positioned to acquire producing oil and gas properties or other businesses for
which we compete.
We are dependent upon third
party suppliers for specific products and equipment necessary to provide certain
of our products and services.
We
sell a variety of CBFs, including brominated CBFs, such as calcium bromide, zinc
bromide, sodium bromide, and other brominated products, some of which we
manufacture and some of which are purchased from third parties. We also sell
calcium chloride as a CBF for use in oil and gas wells and in other forms and
for other applications. Sales of calcium chloride and brominated products
contribute significantly to our revenues. In our manufacture of calcium
chloride, we use hydrochloric acid and other raw materials purchased from third
parties. We purchase raw materials utilized by our Lake Charles calcium chloride
facility from a variety of sources, although supply constraints have resulted in
this facility operating at less than full capacity. In our manufacture of
brominated products, we use bromine, hydrobromic acid, and other raw materials,
including various forms of zinc, which are purchased from third parties. We rely
on Chemtura as a supplier of raw materials, both for our brominated products
needs as well as for the needs of our new El Dorado, Arkansas calcium chloride
plant beginning later in 2009. We also acquire brominated products from several
third party suppliers. If we are unable to acquire the brominated products,
bromine, hydrobromic or hydrochloric acid, zinc, or any other supplies of raw
material at reasonable prices for a prolonged period, our business could be
materially and adversely affected.
Some of the well
abandonment and decommissioning services performed by our Offshore Division
require the use of vessels and services provided by third parties. We lease
equipment and obtain services from certain providers, but these are subject to
availability at reasonable prices.
The fabrication of
GasJackTM
wellhead compressor units by our Compressco subsidiary requires the purchase of
many types of components that we obtain from a single source or a limited group
of suppliers. Our reliance on these suppliers exposes us to the risk of price
increases, inferior component quality, or an inability to obtain an adequate
supply of required components in a timely manner. Our Compressco operation’s
profitability or future growth may be adversely affected due to our dependence
on these key suppliers.
Our operating results and
cash flows for certain of our subsidiaries are subject to
foreign
currency
risk.
The operations of
certain of our subsidiaries are exposed to fluctuations between the U.S. dollar
and certain foreign currencies. Our plans to grow our international operations
could cause this exposure from fluctuating currencies to increase. In
particular, our growing operations in Brazil, as a result of a long-term
contract with Petrobras entered into during 2008, will subject us to increased
foreign currency risk in that country. Historically, exchange rates of foreign
currencies have fluctuated significantly compared to the U.S. dollar, and this
exchange rate volatility is expected to continue. Significant fluctuations in
foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar could adversely affect our balance
sheet and results of operations.
We are exposed to interest
rate risk with regard to a portion of our outstanding
indebtedness.
As
of December 31, 2008, $97.4 million of our outstanding long-term debt consists
of floating rate loans, which bear interest at an agreed upon percentage rate
spread above LIBOR. Accordingly, our cash flows and results of operations are
subject to interest rate risk exposure associated with the level of the variable
rate debt balance outstanding. We currently are not a party to an interest rate
swap contract or other derivative instrument designed to hedge our exposure to
interest rate fluctuation risk.
Operating
Risks:
We will expend significant
costs to repair damage as a result of 2005 and 2008 hurricanes, and a large
portion of these costs may not be covered under our insurance
policies.
We incurred significant damage to certain of
our onshore and offshore operating equipment and facilities during the third
quarters of 2005 and 2008 as a result of hurricanes. In particular, our Maritech
subsidiary suffered varying levels of damage to the majority of its offshore oil
and gas producing platforms, and six of its platforms were toppled and destroyed
by these storms. In addition, two production facilities located in inland waters
were destroyed, one of which was reconstructed during 2007. A majority of our
damaged assets, with the exception of the destroyed Maritech platforms, have
been repaired or are in the final stages of being repaired, and have resumed
operation. We currently estimate that the repairs to the remaining partially
damaged platforms and assets will cost from $6 million to $8 million net to our
interest before insurance recoveries, and these costs will be incurred over the
next several months. With regard to the destroyed offshore platforms, however,
well intervention efforts have been performed on certain wells associated with
two of the platforms destroyed in 2005, and we are assessing the extent of well
intervention work required on wells associated with the four additional
destroyed platforms. In addition, we have yet to incur costs for debris removal
associated with any of the destroyed offshore platforms, but are also assessing
these costs. Such damage assessment, well intervention, and subsequent debris
removal efforts could continue over the next several years. We estimate that
future well intervention and abandonment efforts associated with the destroyed
platforms and production facility, including costs to remove debris, reconstruct
destroyed structures, and redrill certain associated wells, will cost
approximately $140 to $190 million net to our interest before any insurance
recoveries. Due to the non-routine nature of the well intervention and debris
removal efforts, however, our estimates of the future cost to perform this work
may be understated, possibly significantly.
While we believe we will be reimbursed for a
majority of the cost of the damages incurred in excess of policy deductibles
pursuant to our various insurance policies, including the well intervention and
debris removal costs to be incurred by Maritech, there can be no assurances that
all of such expected reimbursements will be collected. Related to certain well
intervention costs incurred in connection with the 2005 hurricanes, our
insurance underwriters have continued to maintain that costs for certain of the
damaged wells do not qualify as covered costs and that certain well intervention
costs for qualifying wells are not covered under the policy for that period. In
addition, the underwriters have also maintained that there is no additional
coverage provided under an endorsement we obtained in August 2005 for the cost
of removal of the platforms destroyed in 2005 or for the repair of other 2005
damage on certain properties in excess of the insured values provided by our
property damage policy for that period. In late 2007, we filed a lawsuit against
the underwriters, adjuster, and one of our brokers in a further attempt to
collect the reimbursement for these well intervention and repair costs incurred
as well as future well intervention and debris removal costs to be incurred
resulting from the 2005 hurricanes.
We
have begun to perform the initial phases of the well intervention work related
to the platforms destroyed by the 2008 hurricanes. Despite our confidence that
the repair, well intervention, and debris removal costs will qualify as covered
costs pursuant to our insurance coverage, a portion of these costs may not be
reimbursed. Despite our efforts to pursue our rights legally, we may not collect
any of the contested well intervention and debris removal costs incurred and to
be incurred as a result of the 2005 storms. Also, the timing of the collection
of any future reimbursements is beyond our control, and we will continue to use
a significant amount of our working capital until such reimbursements are
received. In addition, a portion of the reimbursements ultimately received may
be offset by legal and other administrative costs incurred in our attempts to
collect them. Our estimates of the remaining costs to be incurred may be
imprecise. To the extent actual future costs exceed the policy maximum for these
costs, such excess costs would not be reimbursable.
Our oil and gas production
levels continue to be affected by the 2008 hurricanes.
Our operating cash
flows also continue to be affected by the interruption in Maritech’s oil and gas
production as a result of damage to offshore platforms and pipelines
caused by the 2008 hurricanes. Approximately 32.6% of Maritech’s oil production
and 17.0% of its natural gas production from fields producing before the storms
is currently shut-in. One of the destroyed offshore platforms has resulted in
the loss of production from a key producing field. In addition, much of
Maritech’s daily production is processed through neighboring platforms,
pipelines, and processing facilities of other operators and third parties. Our
insurance protection does not include business interruption coverage. While
repair and recovery efforts have been prioritized to restore Maritech’s
production as soon as possible, these production restoration efforts are
expected to continue beyond 2009. Although we anticipate that many of Maritech’s
remaining shut-in properties will resume during early 2009, the full resumption
of Maritech’s pre-storm production levels may never occur and will depend on the
extent of damage and the repairs or reconstruction needed on certain assets,
including certain assets owned by third parties, the timing of which is outside
of Maritech’s control.
We could incur losses on
well abandonment and decommissioning projects.
Due to competitive
market conditions, a portion of our well abandonment and decommissioning
projects may be performed on a turnkey, modified turnkey, or fixed price day
rate basis, where defined work is delivered for a fixed price and extra work,
which is subject to customer approval, is charged separately. The revenue, cost,
and gross profit realized on these types of contracts can vary from the
estimated amount because of changes in offshore conditions, increases in the
scope of the work to be performed, increased site clearance efforts required,
labor and equipment availability, cost and productivity levels, and the
performance level of other contractors. In addition, unanticipated events such
as accidents, work delays, significant changes in the condition of platforms or
wells, downhole problems, and environmental or other technical issues could
result in significant losses on these types of projects. These variations and
risks may result in our experiencing reduced profitability or losses on these
types of projects or on well abandonment and decommissioning work for our
Maritech subsidiary.
The acquisition of oil and
gas properties and their associated well abandonment and decommissioning
liabilities is based on estimated data that may be materially
incorrect.
In
conjunction with our purchase of oil and gas properties, we perform detailed due
diligence review processes that we believe are consistent with industry
practices. These acquired properties consist of both mature properties, which
are generally in the later stages of their economic lives, as well as
exploitation and prospect opportunities. Each acquisition of oil and gas
properties requires a thorough review of the expected cash flows acquired and
the associated abandonment obligations assumed. The process of estimating
natural gas and oil reserves is complex, requiring significant decisions and
assumptions to be made in evaluating the available geological, geophysical,
engineering, and economic data for each reservoir. The current volatility of
natural gas and oil commodity pricing additionally complicates the calculation
of estimated future cash flows of properties to be acquired. As a result, these
estimates are inherently imprecise. Actual future production, cash flows,
development expenditures, operating and abandonment expenses, and quantities of
recoverable natural gas and oil reserves may vary substantially from those
initially estimated by us. Also, in conjunction with the purchase of certain oil
and gas properties, we assume our proportionate share of the related well
abandonment and decommissioning liabilities after performing detailed estimating
procedures, analysis, and engineering studies. Our estimates of these future
well abandonment and decommissioning liabilities are imprecise and subject to
change due to changing cost estimates, oil and gas prices, revisions of reserve
estimates and other factors. During 2008, Maritech adjusted its decommissioning
liability, either for work performed during the year or related to adjusted
estimates of the cost of future work to be performed. Approximately $7.0 million
of this adjustment was charged to earnings as an operating expense during 2008.
If the actual cost of future abandonment and decommissioning work is materially
greater than our current estimates, such additional costs could have an
additional adverse effect on earnings.
Oil and gas drilling
activities involve numerous risks and are subject to a variety of factors that
we cannot control.
Drilling for oil
and natural gas involves numerous risks, including the risk that we will not
encounter commercially productive oil or natural gas reservoirs. The costs of
drilling, completing, and operating wells are often uncertain, and drilling
operations may be curtailed, delayed, or canceled as a result of a variety of
factors including, but not limited to:
|
·
|
unexpected
drilling conditions;
|
|
·
|
pressure or
irregularities in formations;
|
|
·
|
equipment
failures or accidents;
|
|
·
|
marine risks
such as capsizing, collisions, and
hurricanes;
|
|
·
|
other adverse
weather conditions;
|
|
·
|
shortages or
delays in the delivery of equipment;
and
|
|
·
|
compliance
with environmental and other government requirements, which may increase
our costs or restrict our
activities.
|
During the three
year period ended December 31, 2008, we have expended approximately $324.0
million of development and exploitation costs, and we expect to continue to
incur such costs in the future. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we
charged approximately $9.1 million of dry hole costs incurred to earnings.
Future drilling activities also may not be successful and, if unsuccessful, this
failure could have an adverse effect on our future results of operations and
financial condition. We may not recover all or any portion of our investment in
new wells. In addition, we are often uncertain as to the future cost or timing
of drilling, completing, and operating wells. While all drilling, whether
developmental or exploratory, involves these risks, exploratory drilling
involves greater risks of dry holes or failure to find commercial quantities of
hydrocarbons.
Acquisitions or discoveries
of additional reserves are needed to avoid a material decline in oil and gas
reserves and production volumes.
The rate of
production from oil and gas properties generally declines as reserves are
depleted. Approximately 31.5% of our proved reserves as of December 31, 2008 are
proved producing reserves. Except to the extent that we find or acquire
additional properties containing estimated proved reserves; conduct successful
exploitation, development, or exploration activities; or through engineering
studies, identify additional behind-pipe zones, secondary recovery reserves, or
tertiary recovery reserves, our estimated proved reserves will decline
materially as reserves are produced. Current natural gas and oil commodity
pricing, as well as our need to conserve capital in light of the current
economic environment, may limit our exploitation, development, or exploration
activities for the foreseeable future, which will reduce our ability to replace
produced oil and gas reserves. Future oil and gas production is, therefore,
highly dependent upon our ability and level of success in acquiring or finding
additional reserves.
We may not be able to obtain
access to pipelines, gas gathering, transmission, and processing facilities to
market our oil and gas production.
The marketing of
oil and gas production depends in large part on the availability, proximity and
capacity of pipelines, gas gathering systems and other transportation,
processing and refining facilities, as well as the existence of adequate
markets. If there were insufficient capacity available on these systems, or if
these systems were unavailable to us, the price offered for our production could
be significantly depressed, or we could be forced to shut-in some production or
delay or discontinue drilling plans and commercial production following a
discovery of hydrocarbons while we construct our own facility. We also rely (and
expect to rely in the future) on facilities developed and owned by third parties
in order to process, transmit, and sell our oil and gas production. Our plans to
develop and sell our oil and gas reserves could be materially and adversely
affected by the inability or unwillingness of third parties to provide
sufficient transmission or processing facilities to us.
Our operations involve
significant operating risks, and insurance coverage may not be available or cost
effective.
We
are subject to operating hazards normally associated with the oilfield service
industry and offshore oil and gas production operations, including fires,
explosions, blowouts, cratering, mechanical problems, abnormally pressured
formations, and environmental accidents. Environmental accidents could include,
but are not limited to, oil spills; gas leaks or ruptures; uncontrollable flows
of oil, gas, or well fluids; or discharges of toxic gases or other pollutants.
We are particularly susceptible to adverse weather conditions in the Gulf of
Mexico, including hurricanes and other extreme weather conditions. Damage caused
by high winds and turbulent seas could potentially cause us to curtail both
service and production operations for significant periods of time until damage
can be assessed and repaired. Moreover, even if we do not experience direct
damage from these storms, we may experience disruptions in our operations
because customers may curtail their development activities due to damage to
their platforms, pipelines, and other related facilities.
These hazards also
include injuries to employees and third parties during the performance of our
operations. Our operation of marine vessels, heavy equipment, and offshore
production platforms involves a particularly high level of risk. In addition,
certain of our employees who perform services on offshore platforms and vessels
are covered by the provisions of the Jones Act, the Death on the High Seas Act,
and general maritime law. These laws make the liability limits established by
state workers’ compensation laws inapplicable to these employees and, instead,
permit them or their representatives to pursue actions against us for damages
for job-related injuries. Whenever possible, we obtain agreements from customers
and suppliers that limit our exposure. However, the occurrence of certain
operating hazards, including storms, could result in substantial losses to us
due to injury or loss of life, damage to or destruction of property and
equipment, pollution or environmental damage, and suspension of
operations.
We
have maintained a policy of insuring our risks of operational hazards that we
believe is typical in the industry. Limits of insurance coverage we have
purchased are consistent with the exposures we face and the nature of our
products and services. Due to economic conditions in the insurance industry,
from time to time, we have increased our self-insured retentions and deductibles
for certain policies in order to minimize the increased costs of coverage. In certain areas of our
business, we, from time to time, have elected to assume the risk of loss for
specific assets. To the extent we suffer losses or claims that are not covered,
or are only partially covered by insurance, our results of operations could be
adversely affected.
Following the
hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico region during the third quarters of 2005 and
2008, the cost of the insurance coverage we have typically purchased in the past
has increased dramatically. Current coverage premiums now cost several times
more than they did historically, particularly for offshore oil and gas
production operations. Insurance coverage with favorable deductible and maximum
coverage amounts may not be available in the market, or its cost may not be
justifiable. Our insurance coverage today includes higher deductibles and lower
maximum coverage limits than in prior years. There can be no assurance that any
insurance will be adequate to cover losses or liabilities associated with
operational hazards. We cannot predict the continued availability of insurance
or its availability at premium levels that justify its purchase.
Certain of our operations,
particularly those conducted offshore, are seasonal and depend, in part, on
weather conditions.
The Offshore
Division has historically enjoyed its highest vessel utilization rates during
the period from April to October, when weather conditions are typically more
favorable for offshore activities, and has experienced its lowest utilization
rates in the period from November to March. This Division, under certain turnkey
and other contracts, may bear the risk of delays caused by adverse weather
conditions. Storms can also cause our oil and gas producing properties to be
shut-in. In addition, demand for other products and services we provide are
subject to seasonal fluctuations, due in part to weather conditions that cannot
be predicted. Accordingly, our operating results may vary from quarter to
quarter depending on weather conditions in applicable areas.
Delays or cost overruns on
construction projects could adversely affect our business, or the expected
profitability and cash flows upon completion may not be as timely or as high as
expected.
We are currently constructing a new calcium
chloride plant facility near El Dorado, Arkansas, and have recently completed
construction of a new corporate headquarters facility in The Woodlands,
Texas. Due to our continuing growth strategy, we could have other significant
construction projects in the future. These projects are subject to the risk of
delays or cost overruns inherent in construction projects. These risks include,
but are not limited to:
|
·
|
unforeseen
quality or engineering problems;
|
|
·
|
unanticipated
cost increases;
|
|
·
|
delays in
receipt of necessary equipment; and
|
|
·
|
inability to
obtain the requisite permits or
approvals.
|
The completion of
these construction projects will require a significant amount of working
capital, and delays or cost overruns on these projects could adversely affect
our cash flows. In addition, we will not receive any material increase in
revenue or cash flow from the El Dorado, Arkansas calcium chloride plant until
after it is placed in service and we are able to begin production. Delays in the
completion of this calcium chloride facility could affect future profitability
for our Fluids Division operations.
We face risks related to our
growth strategy.
Our growth strategy
includes both internal growth and growth through acquisitions. Internal growth
may require significant capital expenditure investments, some of which may
become unrecoverable or fail to generate an acceptable level of cash flows.
Internal growth may also require financial resources (including the use of
available cash or additional long-term debt) and management and personnel
resources. Acquisitions also require significant financial and management
resources, both at the time of the transaction and during the process of
integrating the newly acquired business into our operations. If we overextend
our current financial resources by growing too aggressively, we could face
liquidity problems or have difficulty obtaining additional financing. Any such
recent or future acquisition transactions by us may not achieve favorable
financial results. Our operating results could also be adversely affected if we
are unable to successfully integrate newly acquired companies into our
operations, are unable to hire adequate personnel, or are unable to retain
existing personnel. We may not be able to consummate future acquisitions on
favorable terms. Acquisition or internal growth assumptions developed to support
our decisions could prove to be overly optimistic, particularly if we
underestimate the duration of the current economic downturn. Future acquisitions
by us could also result in issuances of equity securities, or the rights
associated with the equity securities, which could potentially dilute earnings
per share. Future acquisitions could also result in the incurrence of additional
debt or contingent liabilities and amortization expenses related to intangible
assets. These factors could adversely affect our future operating results and
financial position.
Our expansion into foreign
countries exposes us to unfamiliar regulations and may expose us to new
obstacles to growth.
We plan to grow both in the United States and
in foreign countries. We have established operations in, among other countries,
Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Canada, the United Kingdom, Norway, Finland, Sweden,
Ivory Coast and Libya, and have joint ventures in Saudi Arabia and The
Netherlands. A portion of our planned future growth includes expansion into
additional countries. Foreign operations carry special risks. Our business in
the countries in which we currently operate and those in which we may operate in
the future could be limited or disrupted by:
|
·
|
government
controls and government actions such as expropriation of assets and
changes in legal and regulatory
environments;
|
|
·
|
import and
export license requirements;
|
|
·
|
political,
social, or economic instability;
|
|
·
|
changes in
tariffs and taxes;
|
|
·
|
restrictions
on repatriating foreign profits back to the United
States;
|
|
·
|
the impact of
anti-corruption laws and the risk that actions taken by us or others on
our behalf may adversely affect our operations and competitive position in
the affected countries; and
|
|
·
|
the limited
knowledge of these markets or the inability to protect our
interests.
|
We
and our affiliates operate in countries where governmental corruption has been
known to exist. While we and our subsidiaries are committed to conducting
business in a legal and ethical manner, there is a risk of violating either the
U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) or laws or legislation promulgated
pursuant to the 1997 OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public
Officials in International Business Transactions or other applicable
anti-corruption regulations that generally prohibit the making of improper
payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or keeping business.
Violation of these laws could result in monetary penalties against us or our
subsidiaries and could damage our reputation and, therefore, our ability to do
business.
Foreign governments
and agencies often establish permit and regulatory standards different from
those in the U.S. If we cannot obtain foreign regulatory approvals, or if we
cannot obtain them when we expect, our growth and profitability from
international operations could be limited.
Our success depends upon the
continued contributions of our personnel, many of whom would be difficult to
replace, and the continued ability to attract new employees.
Our success will depend on our ability to
attract and retain skilled employees. The delivery of our products and services
requires personnel with specialized skills and experience. In addition, our
ability to expand our operations depends in part on our ability to increase the
size of our skilled labor force. The demand for skilled workers in the Gulf
Coast region is high, and the supply is limited. Changes in personnel,
therefore, could adversely affect operating results.
Financial
Risks:
We have significant
long-term debt outstanding.
As
of December 31, 2008, our long-term debt outstanding was approximately $406.8
million and our debt to total capital ratio was 44.1%. Additional
growth could result in increased debt levels to support our capital expenditure
needs or acquisition activities. Our current level of long-term debt could limit
our ability to obtain additional financing on satisfactory terms to fund our
capital expenditures, acquisitions, working capital needs, and other general
corporate requirements. A portion of our long-term debt outstanding is at
variable interest rates. Debt service costs related to outstanding long-term
debt represent a significant use of our operating cash flow and could increase
our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions. Our
long-term debt agreements contain customary covenants and other restrictions and
requirements. In addition, the agreements require us to maintain certain
financial ratio requirements. Significant deterioration of these ratios could
result in a default under the agreements. The agreements also include
cross-default provisions relating to any other indebtedness we have that is
greater than a defined amount. If any such indebtedness is not paid or is
accelerated and such event is not remedied in a timely manner, a default will
occur under the long-term debt agreements. Any event of default, if not timely
remedied, could result in a termination of all commitments of the lenders and an
acceleration of any outstanding loans and credit obligations.
Certain of our businesses
are exposed to significant credit risks.
We
face concentrations of credit risk associated with the significant amounts of
accounts receivable we have with companies in the energy industry. Many of our
customers, particularly those associated with our onshore operations, are small
to medium sized oil and gas operating companies who may be more susceptible to
fluctuating oil and gas commodity prices or generally increased operating
expenses than larger companies. Our ability to collect from our customers may be
impacted by adverse changes in the energy industry.
Maritech purchases
interests in oil and gas properties in connection with the operations of our
Offshore Division. As the owner and operator of these interests, Maritech is
liable for the proper abandonment and decommissioning of the wells, platforms,
and pipelines as well as the site clearance related to these properties. We have
guaranteed a portion of the abandonment and decommissioning liabilities of
Maritech. In certain instances, Maritech is entitled to be paid in the future
for all or a portion of these obligations by the previous owner of the property
once the liability is satisfied. We and Maritech are subject to the risk that
the previous owner(s) will be unable to make these future payments. In addition,
if Maritech acquires less than 100% of the working interest in a property, its
co-owners are responsible for the payment of their portions of the associated
operating expenses and abandonment liabilities. However, if one or more
co-owners do not pay their portions, Maritech and any other nondefaulting
co-owners may be liable for the defaulted amount. If any required payment is not
made by a previous owner or a co-owner and any security is not sufficient to
cover the required payment, we could suffer material losses.
Maritech’s estimates of its
oil and gas reserves and related future cash flows are based on many factors and
assumptions, including various assumptions that are based on conditions in
existence as of the dates of the estimates. Any material changes in those
conditions, or other factors affecting those assumptions, could impair the
quantity and value of our oil and gas reserves.
Maritech’s
estimates of oil and gas reserve information are prepared in accordance with
Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X and reflect only estimates of the accumulation of
oil and gas and the economic recoverability of those volumes. Maritech’s future
production, revenues, and expenditures with respect to such oil and gas reserves
will likely be different from estimates, and any material differences may
negatively affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
As a result, Maritech has experienced and may continue to experience significant
revisions to its reserve estimates.
Oil and gas
reservoir analysis is a subjective process which involves estimating underground
accumulations of oil and gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner.
Estimates of economically recoverable oil and gas reserves and of future net
cash flows associated with such reserves necessarily depend upon a number of
variable factors and assumptions. Because all reserve estimates are to some
degree subjective, each of the following items may prove to differ materially
from that assumed in estimating reserves:
|
·
|
the
quantities of oil and gas that are ultimately
recovered;
|
|
·
|
the
production and operating costs
incurred;
|
|
·
|
the amount
and timing of future development and abandonment expenditures;
and
|
|
·
|
future oil
and gas sales prices.
|
Furthermore,
different reserve engineers may make different estimates of reserves and cash
flow based on the same available data.
The estimated discounted future net cash flows
described in this Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008 should not
be considered as the current market value of the estimated oil and gas proved
reserves attributable to Maritech’s properties. Such estimates are based on
prices and costs as of the date of the estimate, in accordance with SEC
requirements, while future prices and costs may be materially higher or lower.
The SEC currently requires that we report our oil and natural gas reserves
using the price as of the last day of the year. Using lower values in
forecasting reserves will result in a shorter life being given to producing oil
and natural gas properties because such properties, as their production levels
are estimated to decline, will reach an uneconomic limit with lower prices at an
earlier date. There can be no assurance that a decrease in oil and gas prices or
other differences in Maritech’s estimates of its reserves will not adversely
affect our financial position or results of operations.
Our accounting for oil and
gas operations may result in volatile earnings.
We
account for our oil and gas operations using the successful efforts method.
Costs incurred to drill and equip development wells, including unsuccessful
development wells, are capitalized. Costs related to unsuccessful exploratory
wells are expensed as incurred. All capitalized costs are accumulated and
recorded separately for each field and are depleted on a unit-of-production
basis, based on the estimated remaining equivalent proved oil and gas reserves
of each field. The capitalized costs of our oil and natural gas properties, on a
field basis, cannot exceed the estimated undiscounted future net cash
flows of that
field. If net capitalized costs exceed undiscounted future net revenues, we must
write down the costs of each such field to our estimate of its fair market
value. Accordingly, a significant decline in oil or natural gas prices,
unsuccessful exploration and/or development efforts, or an increase in our
decommissioning liabilities could cause a future write-down of capitalized
costs. During the last two quarters of 2008, and primarily due to the decrease
in oil and natural gas prices, we recorded oil and gas property impairments on
proved properties totaling approximately $42.7 million. Unproved properties are
evaluated at the lower of cost or fair market value. On a field by field basis,
our oil and gas properties are assessed for impairment in value whenever
indicators become evident, with any impairment charged to expense. Under the
successful efforts method of accounting, we are exposed to the risk that the
value of a particular property (field) would have to be written down or written
off if an impairment were present.
The current economic
environment could result in significant impairments of certain of our long-lived
assets, including goodwill.
The current
economic environment has resulted in decreased demand for many of our products
and services, which could impact the expected utilization rates of certain of
our long-lived assets, including plant facilities, operating locations, vessels,
and other operating equipment. Under generally accepted accounting principles,
we review the carrying value of our long-lived assets when events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of these assets may not be
recoverable, based on their expected future cash flows. The impact of reduced
expected future cash flow could require the write-down of all or a portion of
the carrying value for these assets, which would result in an impairment charge
to earnings, resulting in increased earnings volatility.
Under generally
accepted accounting principles, we also review the carrying value of our
goodwill for possible impairment annually or when events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that
may be considered a change in circumstances indicating the carrying value of our
goodwill may not be recoverable include a decline in our stock price and our
market capitalization, future cash flows, and slower growth rates in our
industry. In connection with the preparation of our annual financial statements,
we determined that a $47.1 million impairment of goodwill was required. If
current economic and market conditions persist or decline further, we may be
required to record an additional charge to earnings during the period in which
any impairment of our goodwill is determined, resulting in an impact on our
results of operations.
Legal/Regulatory
Risks:
Our operations are subject
to extensive and evolving U.S. and foreign federal, state and local laws and
regulatory requirements that increase our operating costs and expose us to
potential fines, penalties, and litigation.
Laws and
regulations strictly govern our operations relating to: corporate governance,
environmental affairs, health and safety, waste management, and the manufacture,
storage, handling, transportation, use, and sale of chemical products. Our
operation and decommissioning of offshore properties are also subject to and
affected by various types of government regulation, including numerous federal
and state environmental protection laws and regulations. These laws and
regulations are becoming increasingly complex and stringent, and compliance is
becoming increasingly expensive. Governmental authorities have the power to
enforce compliance with these regulations, and violators are subject to civil
and criminal penalties, including civil fines, injunctions, or both. Third
parties may also have the right to pursue legal actions to enforce compliance.
It is possible that increasingly strict environmental laws, regulations, and
enforcement policies could result in substantial costs and liabilities to us and
could subject our handling, manufacture, use, reuse, or disposal of substances
or pollutants to increased scrutiny.
A
large portion of Maritech’s oil and gas operations are conducted on federal
leases that are administered by the MMS and are required to comply with the
regulations and orders promulgated by the MMS under the Outer Continental Shelf
Lands Act. MMS regulations also establish construction requirements for
production facilities located on federal offshore leases and govern the plugging
and abandonment of wells and the removal of production facilities from these
leases. Under limited circumstances, the MMS could require us to suspend or
terminate our operations on a federal lease. The MMS also establishes the basis
for royalty payments due under federal oil and natural gas leases through
regulations issued under applicable statutory authority.
Our business
exposes us to risks such as the potential for harmful substances escaping into
the environment and causing damages or injuries, which could be substantial.
Although we maintain general liability and pollution liability insurance, these
policies are subject to coverage limits. We maintain limited environmental
liability insurance covering named locations and environmental risks associated
with contract services for oil and gas operations and for oil and gas producing
properties. The extent of this coverage is consistent with our other insurance
programs. We could be materially and adversely affected by an enforcement
proceeding or a claim that is not covered or is only partially covered by
insurance.
In
addition to increasing our risk of environmental liability, the rigorous
enforcement of environmental laws and regulations has accelerated the growth of
some of the markets we serve. Decreased regulation and enforcement in the future
could materially and adversely affect the demand for the types of services
offered by certain of our Offshore Services operations and, therefore,
materially and adversely affect our business.
Our proprietary rights may
be violated or compromised, which could damage our
operations.
We
own numerous patents, patent applications, and unpatented trade secret
technologies in the U.S. and certain foreign countries. There can be no
assurance that the steps we have taken to protect our proprietary rights will be
adequate to deter misappropriation of these rights. In addition, independent
third parties may develop competitive or superior technologies.
Item
1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item
2. Properties.
Our properties
consist primarily of our corporate headquarters facility, chemical plants,
processing plants, distribution facilities, barge rigs, heavy lift and dive
support vessels, well abandonment and decommissioning equipment, oil and gas
properties, flowback testing equipment, and compression equipment. The following
information describes facilities that we leased or owned as of
December 31, 2008. We believe our facilities are adequate for our
present needs.
Fluids Division.
Fluids Division facilities include seven chemical production plants located in
the states of Arkansas, California, Louisiana, and West Virginia, and the
country of Finland. The total manufacturing area of these plants, excluding the
two California locations, is approximately 496,000 square feet. The two
California locations contain 29 square miles of acreage containing solar
evaporation ponds and leased mineral acreage. A new calcium chloride plant
facility is currently being constructed in Arkansas. In addition, the Fluids
Division also owns and leases brine mineral reserves in Arkansas.
In addition to the above production plant
facilities, the Fluids Division owns or leases twenty-four service center
facilities, thirteen domestically and eleven internationally. The Fluids
Division also leases eight offices and thirty-seven terminal locations,
twenty-three throughout the United States and fourteen
internationally.
Offshore Division.
The Offshore Division conducts its operations through seven offices and service
facility locations (six of which are leased) located in Texas and Louisiana. In
addition, the Offshore Services segment owns the following fleet of vessels
which it uses in performing its well abandonment, decommissioning, construction,
and contract diving operations:
|
TETRA
Arapaho
|
Derrick barge
with 800-ton capacity crane
|
|
TETRA
DB-1
|
Derrick barge
with 615-ton capacity crane
|
|
TETRA
Southern Hercules
|
Four point
anchor barge
|
|
Epic
Diver
|
220-foot dive
support vessel with saturation diving system
|
|
Epic
Explorer
|
210-foot dive
support vessel with saturation diving system
|
|
Epic
Seahorse
|
210-foot dive
support vessel
|
|
Epic
Mariner
|
110-foot dive
support vessel
|
|
Epic
Pioneer
|
110-foot dive
support vessel
|
|
Epic
Endeavor
|
110-foot
utility vessel
|
See below for a
discussion of the Offshore Division’s oil and gas property assets.
Production Enhancement
Division. Production Enhancement Division facilities include sixteen
production testing distribution facilities (fifteen of which are leased) in
Texas, Colorado, Louisiana, and Pennsylvania and in Brazil, Mexico, Libya,
Bahrain, and Saudi Arabia. Compressco’s facilities include a fabrication and
headquarters facility in Oklahoma, a leased fabrication facility in Alberta,
Canada, a leased service facility in New Mexico, and six sales offices in
Oklahoma, Texas, Colorado, New Mexico, Louisiana, and Canada.
Corporate. Our
headquarters are located in The Woodlands, Texas. As of December 31, 2008, we
leased approximately 105,000 square feet of office space. In February 2009, we
relocated our headquarters to our newly constructed office building, located on
2.635 acres of land adjacent to our previous location. In addition, we own a
20,000 square foot technical facility to service our Fluids Division
operations.
Oil and Gas
Properties.
The following
tables show, for the periods indicated, reserves and operating information
related to our Maritech subsidiary’s oil and gas interests in developed and
undeveloped leases, all of which are located in the Gulf of Mexico region.
Maritech’s oil and gas operations are a separate segment included within our
Offshore Division. The following table provides a brief description as of
December 31, 2008 of Maritech’s most significant oil and gas
properties:
|
|
Net
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
|
Net
Proved
|
|
2008
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
Reserves
Mix
|
|
Production
|
|
Working
|
|
Production
|
|
|
(MMcfe)
|
|
Oil%
|
|
Gas%
|
|
(MMcfe)
|
|
Interest
%
|
|
Status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timbalier Bay
Area
|
23,233
|
|
70%
|
|
30%
|
|
7,735
|
|
100%
|
|
Producing
|
|
Cimarex
Properties,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main
Pass Area
|
18,545
|
|
4%
|
|
96%
|
|
3,479
|
|
50% -
100%
|
|
Producing
|
|
East Cameron
328
|
9,618
|
|
89%
|
|
11%
|
|
1,647
|
|
50%
|
|
Shut-in
|
See also “Note R –
Supplemental Oil and Gas Disclosures” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information.
Oil and Gas Reserves.
Through our Maritech subsidiary, we employ full-time, experienced reservoir
engineers and geologists who are responsible for determining proved reserves in
conformance with SEC guidelines. Reserve estimates were prepared by Maritech
engineers based upon their interpretation of production performance data and
geologic interpretation of sub-surface information derived from the drilling of
wells. In addition to the complete analysis by Maritech’s internal reservoir
engineers, independent petroleum engineers and geologists performed reserve
audits of approximately 85.3% of our proved reserve volumes as of December 31,
2008. The use of the term reserve audit is intended only to refer to the
collective application of the engineering and geologic procedures which the
independent petroleum engineering firms were engaged to perform and may be
defined and used differently by other companies.
A
reserve audit is a process whereby an independent petroleum engineering firm
visits with our technical staff to collect all necessary geologic, geophysical,
engineering, and economic data, followed by an independent reserve evaluation.
The reserve audit of our oil and gas reserves involves the rigorous examination
of our technical evaluation, as well as the interpretation and extrapolation of
well information such as flow rates, reservoir pressure declines, and other
technical information and measurements. Maritech’s internal reservoir engineers
interpret this data to determine the nature of the reservoir and, ultimately,
the quantity of proved oil and gas reserves attributable to the specific
property. Our proved reserves, as reflected in this Annual Report, include only
quantities that Maritech expects to recover commercially using current
technology, prices, and costs, within existing regulatory and environmental
limits. While Maritech can be reasonably certain that the proved reserves will
be produced, the timing and ultimate recovery can be affected by a number of
factors, including completion of development projects, reservoir performance,
regulatory approvals, and changes in projections of long-term oil and gas
prices.
Revisions can
include upward or downward changes in the previously estimated volumes of proved
reserves for existing fields due to evaluation of (1) already available
geologic, reservoir, or production data or (2) new geologic or reservoir data
obtained from wells. Revisions can also occur associated with significant
changes in development strategy, oil and gas prices, or the related production
equipment/facility capacity. Maritech’s independent petroleum engineers also
examined the reserve estimates with respect to reserve categorization, using the
definitions for proved reserves set forth in Regulation S-X Rule 4-10(a) and
subsequent SEC staff interpretations and guidance.
Maritech engaged
Ryder Scott Company, L.P. and DeGolyer and McNaughton to perform the reserve
audits of a portion of our oil and gas reserves as of December 31, 2008 and
2007. In the conduct of these reserve audits, these independent petroleum
engineering firms did not independently verify the accuracy and completeness of
information and data furnished by Maritech with respect to property interests
owned, oil and gas production and well tests from examined wells, or historical
costs of operation and development; however, they did verify product prices,
geological structural and isopach maps, well logs, core analyses, and pressure
measurements. If, in the course of the examinations, a matter of question arose
regarding the validity or sufficiency of any such information or data, the
independent petroleum engineering firms did not accept such information or data
until all questions relating thereto were satisfactorily resolved. Furthermore,
in instances where decline curve analysis was not adequate in determining proved
producing reserves, the independent petroleum engineering firms performed
volumetric analysis, which included the analysis of geologic, reservoir, and
fluids data. Proved undeveloped reserves were analyzed by volumetric analysis,
which takes into consideration recovery factors relative to the geology of the
location and similar reservoirs. Where applicable, the independent petroleum
engineering firms examined data related to well spacing, including potential
drainage from offsetting producing wells, in evaluating proved reserves of
undrilled well locations.
The reserve audit
performed by Ryder Scott Company, L.P. included certain properties selected by
Maritech, including all of our significant properties described above, excluding
the Cimarex Properties, and represented approximately 61.9% of our total proved
oil and gas reserve volumes as of December 31, 2008. The reserve audit performed
by DeGolyer and McNaughton included the Cimarex Properties acquired in December
2007 and represented approximately 23.4% of our total proved oil and gas reserve
volumes as of December 31, 2008. The independent petroleum engineers represent
in their audit reports that they believe Maritech’s estimates of future reserves
were prepared in accordance with generally accepted petroleum engineering and
evaluation principles for the estimation of future reserves as set forth in
Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) standards. In each case, the independent
petroleum engineers concluded that the overall proved reserves for the reviewed
properties as estimated by Maritech, were, in the aggregate, reasonable within
the established audit tolerance guidelines of 10% as set forth in the Standards
Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information
promulgated by the SPE. There were no limitations imposed or encountered by
Maritech or the independent petroleum engineers in the preparation of our
estimated reserves or in the performance of the reserve audits by the
independent petroleum engineers.
The following table
sets forth information with respect to our estimated proved reserves as of
December 31, 2008. The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
attributable to oil and gas reserves was prepared by our Maritech subsidiary,
using constant prices as of the calculation date, net of future income taxes,
discounted at 10% per annum. Reserve information is prepared in accordance with
guidelines established by the SEC. All of Maritech’s reserves are located in
U.S. state and federal offshore waters in the Gulf of Mexico region and onshore
Louisiana, and approximately 88% of our estimated proved reserves as of December
31, 2008 are classified as proved developed reserves.
|
|
|
December
31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
proved reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
gas (Mcf)
|
|
|
42,012,000 |
|
|
Oil
(Bbls)
|
|
|
5,937,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized
measure of discounted future net cash flows
|
|
$ |
60,348,000 |
|
For additional
information regarding estimates of oil and gas reserves, including estimates of
proved and proved developed reserves, the standardized measure of discounted
future net cash flows, and the changes in discounted future net cash flows, see
“Note R – Supplemental Oil and Gas Disclosures” in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Maritech is not
required to file, and has not filed on a recurring basis, estimates of its total
proved net oil and gas reserves with any U.S. or non-U.S. governmental
regulatory authority or agency other than the Department of Energy (the DOE) and
the SEC. The estimates furnished to the DOE have been consistent with those
furnished to the SEC. They are not necessarily directly comparable, however, due
to special DOE reporting requirements. In no instance have the estimates for the
DOE differed by more than five percent from the corresponding estimates
reflected in total reserves reported to the SEC.
Production
Information. The table below sets forth information related to
production, average sales price, and average production cost per unit of oil and
gas produced during 2008, 2007, and 2006:
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
gas (Mcf)
|
|
|
10,988,840 |
|
|
|
9,515,214 |
|
|
|
7,812,339 |
|
|
Oil
(Bbls)
|
|
|
1,466,621 |
|
|
|
1,985,183 |
|
|
|
1,356,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
Gas
|
|
$ |
99,901,000 |
|
|
$ |
76,202,000 |
|
|
$ |
81,271,000 |
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
107,279,000 |
|
|
|
137,136,000 |
|
|
|
82,828,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
207,180,000 |
|
|
$ |
213,338,000 |
|
|
$ |
164,099,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
realized unit prices and costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
gas (per Mcf)
|
|
$ |
9.09 |
|
|
$ |
8.01 |
|
|
$ |
10.40 |
|
|
Oil
(per Bbl)
|
|
$ |
73.15 |
|
|
$ |
69.08 |
|
|
$ |
61.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
cost per equivalent Mcf
|
|
$ |
4.53 |
|
|
$ |
4.18 |
|
|
$ |
3.99 |
|
|
Depletion
cost per equivalent Mcf
|
|
$ |
4.19 |
|
|
$ |
3.45 |
|
|
$ |
2.42 |
|
Production cost per
equivalent Mcf excludes the impact of storm repair and insurance related costs
and recoveries, which were charged or credited to operations during each of the
years presented, with approximately $13.5 million being charged during 2007 and
$8.5 million in 2008. The 2008 production cost per equivalent Mcf was also
increased due to the impact of hurricanes which resulted in significant
properties being shut-in during the last four months of 2008. Depletion cost per
equivalent Mcf excludes the impact of dry hole costs and property
impairments.
Acreage and Productive
Wells. At December 31, 2008, our Maritech subsidiary owned interests in
the following oil and gas wells and acreage:
|
|
Productive
Gross
|
|
Productive
Net
|
|
Developed
|
|
Undeveloped
|
|
|
Wells
|
|
Wells
|
|
Acreage
|
|
Acreage
|
|
State/Area
|
Oil
|
|
Gas
|
|
Oil
|
|
Gas
|
|
Gross
|
|
Net
|
|
Gross
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana
Onshore
|
15
|
|
-
|
|
0.90
|
|
-
|
|
367
|
|
23
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
Louisiana
Offshore
|
55
|
|
21
|
|
55.00
|
|
21.00
|
|
16,559
|
|
16,559
|
|
5,777
|
|
5,777
|
|
Texas
Offshore
|
-
|
|
2
|
|
-
|
|
1.50
|
|
2,864
|
|
1,968
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
Federal
Offshore
|
19
|
|
56
|
|
9.80
|
|
21.70
|
|
346,601
|
|
164,920
|
|
112,753
|
|
78,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
89
|
|
79
|
|
65.70
|
|
44.20
|
|
366,391
|
|
183,470
|
|
118,530
|
|
84,662
|
Drilling Activity.
Maritech participated in the drilling of 10 gross development wells (4.3 net
wells) during 2008, two of which were unproductive. Maritech participated in the
drilling of 16 gross development wells (11.4 net wells) during 2007, two of
which were unproductive. Maritech participated in the drilling of 10 gross
productive wells (6.75 net wells) during 2006. As of December 31, 2008, there
was 1 additional gross well (0.5 net wells) in the process of being drilled. As
of December 31, 2007, there were 5
additional wells
(2.5 net wells) in the process of being drilled. As of December 31, 2006 there
were 3 additional wells (1.33 net wells) in the process of being drilled, one of
which was subsequently determined to be unproductive.
Item
3. Legal Proceedings.
We
are named defendants in several lawsuits and respondents in certain governmental
proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of
lawsuits or other proceedings against us cannot be predicted with certainty,
management does not expect these matters to have a material adverse impact on
the financial statements.
Class Action Lawsuit - Between
March 27, 2008 and April 30, 2008, two putative class action complaints were
filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
(Houston Division) against us and certain of our officers by certain
stockholders on behalf of themselves and other stockholders who purchased our
common stock between January 3, 2007 and October 16, 2007. The complaints assert
claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The complaints allege that the
defendants violated the federal securities laws during the period by, among
other things, disseminating false and misleading statements and/or concealing
material facts concerning our current and prospective business and financial
results. The complaints also allege that, as a result of these actions, our
stock price was artificially inflated during the class period, which enabled our
insiders to sell their personally-held shares for a substantial gain. The
complaints seek unspecified compensatory damages, costs, and expenses. On May 8,
2008, the Court consolidated these complaints as In re TETRA Technologies, Inc.
Securities Litigation, No. 4:08-cv-0965 (S.D. Tex.). On August 27, 2008,
Lead Plaintiff Fulton County Employees’ Retirement System filed its Amended
Consolidated Complaint. On October 28, 2008, we filed a motion to dismiss the
federal class action.
Between May 28,
2008 and June 27, 2008, two petitions were filed by alleged stockholders in the
District Courts of Harris County, Texas, 133rd and
113th
Judicial Districts, purportedly on our behalf. The suits name our directors and
certain officers as defendants. The factual allegations in these lawsuits mirror
those in the class actions, and the claims are for breach of fiduciary duty,
unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and waste of corporate
assets. The petitions seek disgorgement, costs, expenses, and unspecified
equitable relief. On September 22, 2008, the 133rd
District Court consolidated these complaints as In re TETRA Technologies, Inc.
Derivative Litigation, Cause No. 2008-23432 (133rd Dist.
Ct., Harris County, Tex.), and appointed Thomas Prow and Mark Patricola as
Co-Lead Plaintiffs. This case has been stayed by agreement of the parties
pending the Court’s ruling on our motion to dismiss the federal class
action.
At this stage, it is impossible to predict the
outcome of these proceedings or their impact upon us. We currently believe that
the allegations made in the federal complaints and state petitions are without
merit, and we intend to seek dismissal of and vigorously defend against these
actions. While a successful outcome cannot be guaranteed, we do not reasonably
expect these lawsuits to have a material adverse effect.
Insurance Litigation –
Through December 31, 2008, we have expended approximately $47.4 million
of well intervention work on certain wells associated with two of the three
Maritech offshore platforms which were destroyed as a result of Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita in 2005. We estimate that future repair and well intervention
efforts related to these destroyed platforms, including platform debris removal
and other storm related costs, will result in approximately $50 to $70 million
of additional costs. Approximately $28.9 million of the well intervention costs
previously expended and submitted to our insurance providers have been
reimbursed; however, our insurance underwriters have continued to maintain that
well intervention costs for certain of the damaged wells do not qualify as
covered costs and that certain well intervention costs for qualifying wells are
not covered under the policy for that period. In addition, the underwriters have
also maintained that there is no additional coverage provided under an
endorsement we obtained in August 2005 for the cost of removal of these
platforms or for other damage repairs on certain properties in excess of the
insured values provided by our property damage policy. After continuing to
provide requested information to the underwriters regarding the damaged wells,
and having numerous discussions with the underwriters, brokers, and insurance
adjusters, we have yet to receive the requested reimbursement for these
contested costs. On November 16, 2007, we filed
a
lawsuit in the 359th
Judicial District Court, Montgomery County, Texas, entitled Maritech Resources, Inc. v. Certain
Underwriters and Insurance Companies at Lloyd’s, London subscribing to Policy
no. GA011150U and Steege Kingston, in which we are seeking damages for
breach of contract and various related claims and a declaration of the extent of
coverage of an endorsement to the policy. We cannot predict the outcome of this
lawsuit.
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
No
matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders, through solicitation
of proxies or otherwise, during the fourth quarter of the year ended December
31, 2008.
PART
II
Item
5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Repurchases of Equity Securities.
Price
Range of Common Stock
Our common stock is
traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “TTI.” As of February 23,
2009, there were approximately 12,710 holders of record of the common stock. The
following table sets forth the high and low sale prices of the common stock for
each calendar quarter in the two years ended December 31, 2008, as reported by
the New York Stock Exchange.
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
Quarter
|
|
$ |
19.38 |
|
|
$ |
13.56 |
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
|
25.00 |
|
|
|
14.72 |
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
|
24.02 |
|
|
|
5.69 |
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
|
7.24 |
|
|
|
3.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
Quarter
|
|
$ |
25.69 |
|
|
$ |
21.00 |
|
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
|
28.94 |
|
|
|
24.61 |
|
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
|
30.20 |
|
|
|
17.10 |
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
|
22.96 |
|
|
|
14.58 |
|
Market Price of Common
Stock
The following graph
compares the five-year cumulative total returns of our common stock, the
Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Price Index (S&P 500) and the
Philadelphia Oil Service Sector Index (PHLX Oil Service Sector), assuming $100
invested in each stock or index on December 31, 2003, all dividends reinvested,
and a fiscal year ending December 31. This information shall be deemed
furnished, and not filed, in this Form 10-K, and shall not be deemed
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as a result of this furnishing, except to
the extent we specifically incorporate it by reference.
Dividend
Policy
We
have never paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to
retain earnings to finance the growth and development of our business. Any
payment of cash dividends in the future will depend upon our financial
condition, capital requirements, and earnings, as well as other factors the
Board of Directors may deem relevant. We declared a dividend of one Preferred
Stock Purchase Right per share of common stock to holders of record at the close
of business on November 6, 1998. See “Note T – Stockholders’ Rights Plan” in the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements attached hereto for a description of
such Rights. In May 2006, we declared a 2-for-1 stock split, which was effected
in the form of a stock dividend to all stockholders of record as of May 15,
2006. See “Note K –
Capital Stock” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements attached hereto
for a description of this stock split. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Liquidity and Capital
Resources” for a discussion of potential restrictions on our ability to pay
dividends.
Purchases
of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
In
January 2004, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $20
million of our common stock. Purchases will be made from time to time in open
market transactions at prevailing market prices. The repurchase program may
continue until the authorized limit is reached, at which time the Board of
Directors may review the option of increasing the authorized limit. During 2004,
we repurchased 210,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to the repurchase
program at a cost of approximately $3.3 million. During 2005, we repurchased
130,950 shares of our common stock pursuant to the repurchase program at a cost
of approximately $2.4 million. There were no repurchases made during 2006, 2007,
or 2008 pursuant to the repurchase program. Shares repurchased during the fourth
quarter of 2008 other than pursuant to our repurchase program are as
follows:
|
Period
|
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Average
Price Paid per Share
|
|
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or
Programs
(1)
|
|
|
Maximum
Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased
Under the Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 1 - Oct
31, 2008
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
14,327,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 1 - Nov
30, 2008
|
|
|
1,506 |
(2) |
|
$ |
3.77 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
14,327,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 - Dec
31, 2008
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
14,327,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
14,327,000 |
|
|
(1)
|
In January
2004, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $20
million of our common stock. Purchases will be made from time to time in
open market transactions at prevailing market prices. The repurchase
program may continue until the authorized limit is reached, at which time
the Board of Directors may review the option of increasing the authorized
limit.
|
|
(2)
|
Shares we
received in connection with the exercise of certain employee stock options
or the vesting of certain employee restricted stock. These shares were not
acquired pursuant to the stock repurchase
program.
|
Item
6. Selected Financial Data.
The following tables set forth our selected
consolidated financial data for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006,
2005, and 2004. The selected consolidated financial data does not purport to be
complete and should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified by, the more
detailed information, including the Consolidated Financial Statements and
related Notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operation” appearing elsewhere in this report. Please read “Item
1A. Risk Factors” beginning on page 10 for a discussion of the material
uncertainties which might cause the selected consolidated financial data not to
be indicative of our future financial condition or results of operations. During
2008, Maritech acquired certain oil and gas properties. During 2007, we
completed the acquisition of two service companies and Maritech acquired certain
oil and gas properties. During 2006, we
completed the acquisitions of the operations of Epic Divers, Inc., Beacon
Resources, LLC, and a heavy lift barge. During 2005, we acquired certain oil and
gas properties as part of our Maritech subsidiary’s operations. During 2004, we
completed the acquisitions of
Compressco, Inc.,
the European calcium chloride assets, and a heavy lift barge. These acquisitions
significantly impact the comparison of our financial statements for 2008 to
earlier years. In December 2007, we sold our process services operations. In 2006, we made the
decision to discontinue our Venezuelan fluids and production testing operations.
In 2003, we made the decision to discontinue the operations of our Norwegian
process services operations. During 2000, we commenced our exit from the
micronutrients business. Accordingly, we have reflected each of the above
operations as discontinued operations. During 2008, we recorded significant
impairments of oil and gas properties, goodwill, and other long-lived assets.
During 2007, we recorded significant impairments of our oil and gas properties.
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
Income
Statement Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
$ |
1,009,065 |
|
$ |
982,483 |
|
$ |
767,795 |
|
$ |
509,249 |
|
$ |
334,881 |
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
152,001 |
|
|
116,383 |
|
|
252,804 |
|
|
123,672 |
(1)
|
|
71,983 |
(1)(2) |
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
16,512 |
|
|
160,800 |
|
|
54,317 |
|
|
23,494 |
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
(17,557 |
) |
|
(17,886 |
) |
|
(13,637 |
) |
|
(6,310 |
) |
|
(1,962 |
) |
|
Interest
income
|
|
779 |
|
|
731 |
|
|
348 |
|
|
330 |
|
|
286 |
|
|
Other income
(expense), net
|
|
12,884 |
|
|
2,805 |
|
|
4,858 |
|
|
3,692 |
|
|
257 |
|
|
Income (loss)
before discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
operations
|
|
(9,655 |
) |
|
1,221 |
|
|
99,880 |
|
|
34,802 |
|
|
15,184 |
|
|
Net income
(loss)
|
$ |
(12,136 |
) |
$ |
28,771 |
|
$ |
101,878 |
|
$ |
38,062 |
|
$ |
17,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss)
per share, before
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
discontinued
operations (3)
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
$ |
0.02 |
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
Average
shares
(3)
|
|
74,519 |
|
|
77,353 |
|
|
71,631 |
|
|
68,588 |
|
|
67,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss)
per diluted share, before
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
discontinued
operations (3)
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
$ |
0.02 |
|
$ |
1.33 |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
Average
diluted shares
(3)
|
|
74,519 |
(4) |
|
75,921 |
(5) |
|
74,824 |
|
|
72,137 |
|
|
71,199 |
|
|
(1)
|
Gross profit
for these periods reflects the reclassification of certain billed
operating costs as cost of revenues, which had previously been credited to
general and administrative expense. The reclassified amounts were $1,113
for 2005 and $360 for 2004.
|
|
(2)
|
Gross profit
for this period reflects the reclassification of certain depreciation,
amortization and accretion costs as cost of revenues, which had previously
been included in general and administrative expense. The reclassified
amount was $3,619 for 2004.
|
|
(3)
|
Net income per
share and average share outstanding information reflects the retroactive
impact of a 2-for-1 stock split as of May 15, 2006, and a 3-for-2 stock
split as of August 19, 2005. Each of the stock splits were effected in the
form of a stock dividend as of the record
dates.
|
|
(4)
|
For the year
ended December 31, 2008, the calculation of average diluted shares
outstanding excludes the impact of all of our outstanding stock options,
since all were antidilutive due to the net loss for the
period.
|
|
(5)
|
For the year
ended December 31, 2007, the calculation of average diluted shares
outstanding excludes the impact of 716,354 average outstanding stock
options that would have been
antidilutive.
|
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working
capital
|
|
$ |
222,832 |
|
|
$ |
181,441 |
|
|
$ |
262,572 |
|
|
$ |
135,989 |
|
|
$ |
117,350 |
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
1,412,624 |
|
|
|
1,295,536 |
|
|
|
1,086,190 |
|
|
|
726,850 |
|
|
|
508,988 |
|
|
Long-term
debt
|
|
|
406,840 |
|
|
|
358,024 |
|
|
|
336,381 |
|
|
|
157,270 |
|
|
|
143,754 |
|
|
Decommissioning
and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
long-term
liabilities
|
|
|
277,482 |
|
|
|
247,543 |
|
|
|
167,671 |
|
|
|
150,570 |
|
|
|
68,145 |
|
|
Stockholders'
equity
|
|
$ |
515,821 |
|
|
$ |
447,919 |
|
|
$ |
420,380 |
|
|
$ |
284,147 |
|
|
$ |
236,181 |
|
Item
7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation.
The following
discussion is intended to analyze major elements of our consolidated financial
statements and provide insight into important areas of management’s focus. This
section should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements
and the accompanying Notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. We have
accounted for the discontinuance or disposal of certain businesses as
discontinued operations and have adjusted prior period financial information to
exclude these businesses from continuing operations.
Statements in the
following discussion may include forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. See “Item 1A. Risk
Factors,” for additional discussion of these factors and risks.
Business
Overview
The changing global
economic environment, particularly as it has affected the oil and gas industry,
has created an uncertainty that threatens to interrupt a period of unprecedented
growth for our company. During the year ended December 31, 2008, and for the
seventh consecutive year, our consolidated revenues increased over the prior
year period, reflecting the increasing demand for our products and services
during this period, and the execution of our growth strategy, both through
internal expansion and acquisitions. Much of the increase in the general demand
for energy services during this period was in response to escalating oil and
natural gas pricing, caused by the increased energy demands of a growing global
economy. While we continue to pursue growth, the impact of decreased oil and
natural gas prices and uncertain capital markets caused by the current global
financial crisis has now decreased the demand for many of our products and
services. This has caused us to temper our growth strategy by implementing more
conservative fiscal disciplines, such as lower growth expectations, operating
and administrative cost reductions, more careful spending on capital projects,
consideration of alternative sources of capital, and a more focused effort on
using excess cash flow to reduce our long-term debt whenever possible. During
2008, and particularly subsequent to the third quarter hurricanes which
interrupted a large portion of Maritech’s production cash flows, our long-term
debt balance grew to $406.8 million, resulting in a debt to total
capital ratio of 44.1% as of December 31, 2008. Subsequent to yearend, and
as of February 27, 2009, this long-term debt balance has increased to $425.4
million and is not expected to significantly decrease until key capital
expenditure projects in progress are completed. The most significant capital
project is the construction of a new calcium chloride plant in El Dorado,
Arkansas, which is expected to be completed and begin operations in the fourth
quarter of 2009. Carefully managing our long-term debt levels and our growing
asset retirement and decommissioning liabilities, while facing potentially
weakening overall operating cash flows, are key strategies during this period of
economic uncertainty, the duration of which appears to be
indefinite.
Despite reporting
overall increased consolidated revenues during 2008 compared to 2007, our
profitability was negatively affected by several events and accounting
adjustments recorded during the year. Our Maritech segment was severely affected
by hurricanes during the third quarter of 2008, which resulted in a significant
portion of its producing properties being shut-in during the last several months
of the year. Maritech also was directly impacted by the significant decrease in
oil and natural gas prices experienced during the last half of 2008, which
largely contributed to $42.7 million of oil and gas property impairments
recognized in 2008. These decreased oil and natural gas prices are expected to
continue during 2009, affecting the profitability of Maritech and indirectly
affecting each of our other reporting segments as well. Our Fluids Division
showed significant operating growth during 2008, with improved gross profit as a
result of lower costs for its CBF products and increased completion service
margins. Our Offshore Services segment (formerly known as our Well Abandonment
& Decommissioning Services segment) showed minimally improved performance,
as lower capacity and poor operating weather conditions during much of the year
were offset by the strong performance late in the year of its contract diving
operation, which is capitalizing on the post-hurricane market demand for its
services. The performances of our Fluids and Offshore Services segments were
offset, however, by the impairments of goodwill and other long-term assets,
which resulted in each segment reporting decreased pretax earnings compared to
the prior year. Our Production Enhancement Division, consisting of our
Production Testing segment and Compressco segment, reported continuing growth in
earnings compared to the prior year, as each of these businesses continued to
expand their operations during most of the year. Corporate overhead decreased
during 2008 compared to 2007 as growth in overall administrative expenses were
more than offset by
gains recorded to other income associated with certain commodity derivative
contracts during the fourth quarter of 2008.
Future demand for
our products and services depends primarily on activity in the oil and gas
exploration and production industry, which is significantly affected by that
industry’s level of expenditures for the exploration and production of oil and
gas reserves and for the plugging and decommissioning of abandoned oil and gas
properties. Industry expenditures, as indicated by rig count statistics and
other measures, have decreased significantly recently in response to lower oil
and natural gas pricing and the general uncertainty regarding availability of
capital resources in the current economic environment. Our overall growth is
hampered by the current decreased industry demand for our products and services,
although we still believe that there are growth opportunities for our products
and services in the U.S. and international markets, supported primarily
by:
|
·
|
increases in
technologically-driven deepwater gas well completions in the Gulf of
Mexico;
|
|
·
|
continued
reservoir depletion in the U.S.;
|
|
·
|
advancing age
of offshore platforms in the Gulf of Mexico;
and
|
|
·
|
increasing
development of oil and gas reserves
abroad.
|
Our Fluids Division
generates revenues and cash flows by manufacturing and selling completion fluids
and providing filtration, water transfer, and associated products and
engineering services to domestic and international exploration and production
companies. In addition, the Fluids Division also provides liquid and dry calcium
chloride products manufactured at its production facilities or purchased from
third party suppliers to a variety of markets outside the energy industry.
Fluids Division revenues increased 4.0% during 2008 compared to the prior year
due primarily to increased prices and service activity. The overall outlook for
the Division’s completion services business is dependent on the level of oil and
gas drilling activity, particularly in the Gulf of Mexico, which has remained
flat or has decreased during the past several years, due largely to the maturity
of the producing fields in the heavily developed portions of the Gulf of Mexico.
More recently, overall industry drilling activity has also been acutely impacted
by the current decreased oil and natural gas prices and increased capital
constraints as a result of the general economic conditions. Potentially
offsetting some of this decline, the Division is attempting to capitalize on the
current industry trend toward drilling deepwater wells that generally require
greater volumes of more expensive brine solutions. In addition, we are also
pursuing specific international opportunities where demand for our Fluids
Division products has been more stable. During 2008, the Fluids Division entered
into a long-term contract with Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) to provide
completion fluids for its deepwater drilling program offshore Brazil. To further
the growth of the Division’s manufactured products operation and provide
additional internally produced supply for our completion fluids operations, in
2007 we began construction of a new calcium chloride plant facility located in
El Dorado, Arkansas. The plant is expected to increase the Division’s capacity
for providing calcium chloride to its customers, generating revenues and cash
flows beginning in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Our Offshore
Division consists of two operating segments: the Offshore Services segment and
Maritech segment. Offshore Services generates revenues and cash flows by
performing (1) downhole and sub-sea services such as plugging and abandonment,
workover, inland water drilling, and wireline services, (2) construction and
decommissioning services, including hurricane remediation, and (3) diving
services involving conventional and saturated air diving. The services provided
by the Offshore Services segment are marketed primarily in the Gulf Coast region
of the U.S., including offshore, inland waters and in certain onshore locations.
Gulf of Mexico platform decommissioning and well abandonment activity levels are
driven primarily by MMS regulations; the age of producing fields, production
platforms and other structures; oil and natural gas commodity prices; sales
activity of mature oil and gas producing properties; and overall oil and gas
company activity levels. In addition, the segment intends to capitalize on the
current demand for well abandonment and decommissioning activity in the Gulf of
Mexico, including a portion of the work to be performed over the next several
years on offshore properties that were damaged or destroyed by the significant
hurricanes that occurred in 2005 and 2008. Given the increasing cost to insure
offshore properties, many oil and gas operators are accelerating their plans to
abandon and decommission their offshore wells and platforms. Offshore Services
revenues decreased by 10.2% during 2008, primarily associated with the heavy
lift capacity from vessels which we leased during portions of 2007 and due to
decreased 2008 activity levels for well abandonment and decommissioning
services, a portion of which was due to unfavorable weather during much of the
year. This decrease was despite a significant increase in dive services
activity, particularly following the 2008 hurricanes. Despite
this increase in
demand for dive services, the Division expects overall activity to further
decrease in 2009 due to lower oil and natural gas prices.
Through Maritech
and its subsidiaries, the Division acquires, manages, explores, and exploits oil
and gas properties in the offshore, inland water and onshore region of the Gulf
of Mexico and generates revenues and cash flows from the sale of the associated
oil and natural gas production volumes. Maritech acquires properties for their
e